From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Huang Shijie Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: gpmi: add a new DT property to use the datasheet's minimum required ECC Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:39:27 +0800 Message-ID: <5279ABDF.7070709@freescale.com> References: <1382929517-22606-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <20131105200729.GT20061@ld-irv-0074.broadcom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20131105200729.GT20061-bU/DPfM3abD4WzifrMjOTkcViWtcw2C0@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Brian Norris Cc: dwmw2-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org, dedekind1-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org, linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org =E4=BA=8E 2013=E5=B9=B411=E6=9C=8806=E6=97=A5 04:07, Brian Norris =E5=86= =99=E9=81=93: > This description still uses Linux-isms/MTD-isms (ecc_strength_ds, > ecc_step_ds, nand_chip{}, JFFS2). I would personally write this as > something like the following: > > - fsl,use-minimum-ecc: Protect this NAND flash with the minimum EC= C > strength required. The required ECC strength is > automatically discoverable for some flash > (e.g., according to the ONFI standard). > However, note that if this strength is not > discoverable, the software may choose an > implementation-defined ECC scheme. this description is better then mine. thanks Huang Shijie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html