From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sekhar Nori Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] gpio: davinci: Fixed a check for unbanked gpio Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 17:12:47 +0530 Message-ID: <527A2B37.4040308@ti.com> References: <1383406775-14902-1-git-send-email-prabhakar.csenng@gmail.com> <1383406775-14902-2-git-send-email-prabhakar.csenng@gmail.com> <527A1EC7.20400@ti.com> <527A28EF.9070601@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <527A28EF.9070601-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: Errors-To: davinci-linux-open-source-bounces-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org To: Grygorii Strashko , Prabhakar Lad , Linus Walleij Cc: Mark Rutland , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org" , Russell King , Pawel Moll , "linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Stephen Warren , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , "linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Landley , Alex Elder , Grant Likely , Ian Campbell , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Grygorii, On Wednesday 06 November 2013 05:03 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > Hi Sekhar, Linus, > > On 11/06/2013 12:49 PM, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On Wednesday 06 November 2013 03:45 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote: >>> Hi Linus, >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Linus Walleij >>> wrote: >>>> On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Prabhakar Lad >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Linus Walleij >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Lad, Prabhakar >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> From: "Lad, Prabhakar" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This patch fixes the check for the offset in >>>>>>> gpio_to_irq_unbanked() function. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar >>>>>> >>>>>> Is this a regression that should go in right now? >>>>>> >>>>> Yes it needs too. >>>> >>>> But on top of *what* exactly? >>>> >>>> This does not apply to my gpio tree devel branch and >>>> not even on the mainline kernel. >>>> >>> Looks like this needs to go via ARM tree as the earlier >>> patches have gone via ARM tree itself [1]. >>> If you can ACK it Sekhar can get it in via ARM tree. >> >> The dependent patches are all in linux-next through ARM SoC queued for >> v3.13 merge. This fix can either be sent late in merge cycle once Linus >> has pulled ARM SoC or after v3.13-rc1 comes out. > > Pls, wait a bit - this fix is incomplete :( The below changes have to be > done too: Can either you or Prabhakar send a separate patch (series) with only the fixes? Thanks, Sekhar