From: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Ashwini Ghuge <aghuge-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org"
<rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
"ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org"
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
"rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org"
<rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>,
"linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org"
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: tegra124: add pinctrl driver for NVIDIA's Tegra124 SoC
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:24:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <528120EF.1030000@wwwdotorg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131111180124.GA27735-NuALmloUBlrZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
On 11/11/2013 11:01 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 05:41:58PM +0000, Ashwini Ghuge wrote:
>> The driver uses the common Tegra pinctrl driver utility functions to
>> implement the majority of the driver. It is based on the similar Tegra114
>> pinctrl
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nvidia,tegra124-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/nvidia,tegra124-pinctrl.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
>> +NVIDIA Tegra124 pinmux controller
>> +
>> +The Tegra124 pinctrl binding is very similar to the Tegra114
>> +pinctrl binding, as described in nvidia,tegra114-pinmux.txt. In fact, this
>> +document assumes that binding as a baseline, and only documents the
>> +differences between the two bindings.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible: "nvidia,tegra124-pinmux"
>> +- reg: Should contain the register physical address and length for each of
>> + the pad control and mux registers. The first bank of address must be the
>> + driver strength pad control register address and second bank address must
>> + be pinmux register address.
>
> It might be worth using reg-names here, in case a future hardware
> variant builds atop of this.
This binding is essentially identical to the existing Tegra20/30/114
bindings, it'd just that the HW has different sets of valid values for
pin/group/function names. I'd rather keep it consistent with the other
bindings.
It's quite unlikely some future binding will build on top of this; if
the HW changes at all, we'll almost certainly have a completely new
binding definition to cater for the differing pin/group/function names.
>> +Tegra124 has the following optional properties for pin configuration subnodes:
>> +- nvidia,enable-input: Integer. Enable the pin's input path. 0: no, 1: yes.
>
> Why are the properties representing boolean values not empty / boolean
> properties (as can be handled in the kernel with of_property_read_bool)?
They aren't Boolean, they're tri-state: Set off, set on, don't change
the setting. The "pinctrl state" nodes each list a set of changes to
make to the HW to enter/set-up that state, and those sets of changes may
not need to alter all values, hence it's important to be able to
differentiate between not changing a value, and the value to change it to.
>> +- nvidia,open-drain: Integer. Enable open drain mode. 0: no, 1: yes.
>> +- nvidia,lock: Integer. Lock the pin configuration against further changes
>> + until reset. 0: no, 1: yes.
>> +- nvidia,io-reset: Integer. Reset the IO path. 0: no, 1: yes.
>> +- nvidia,rcv-sel: Integer. Select VIL/VIH receivers. 0: normal, 1: high.
>
> Why not just have nvidia,rcv-high as a boolean property, and default to
> normal?
Same argument.
>> +- nvidia,drive-type: Integer. Valid range 0...3.
>
> What do these values mean?
They're the raw HW values. We probably should add something like, "See
the TRM's definition of field XXX for further details".
>> +As with Tegra114, see the Tegra TRM for complete details regarding which
>> +groups support which functionality.
>
> Where can I find this TRM?
The TRM for earlier Tegras is available at e.g.:
https://developer.nvidia.com/tegra-3-technical-reference-manual
We probably haven't published the Tegra124 TRM yet:-( However, the
overall structure of the Tegra124 pinmux is the same as for the Tegra30
pinmux documented at that link. The difference is the set of
pins/groups/functions.
> [...]
>
>> +Example:
>> +
>> + pinmux: pinmux {
>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra124-pinmux";
>> + reg = <0x70000868 0x148 /* Pad control registers */
>> + 0x70003000 0x40c>; /* PinMux registers */
>
> For consistency, please bracket entries in lists individually:
>
> reg = <0x70000868 0x148>, /* Pad control registers */
> <0x70003000 0x40c>; /* PinMux registers */
I had pointed this out to Ashwini in internal review, along with a few
other minor formatting/wording issues elsewhere. Hopefully that'll all
be rolled into v2...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-11 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-11 17:41 [PATCH] pinctrl: tegra124: add pinctrl driver for NVIDIA's Tegra124 SoC Ashwini Ghuge
2013-11-11 18:01 ` Mark Rutland
[not found] ` <20131111180124.GA27735-NuALmloUBlrZROr8t4l/smS4ubULX0JqMm0uRHvK7Nw@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-11 18:24 ` Stephen Warren [this message]
[not found] ` <528120EF.1030000-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2013-11-12 9:19 ` Mark Rutland
2013-12-04 19:30 ` Stephen Warren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=528120EF.1030000@wwwdotorg.org \
--to=swarren-3lzwwm7+weoh9zmkesr00q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Pawel.Moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=aghuge-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-doc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob-VoJi6FS/r0vR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).