From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eduardo Valentin Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 20/20] MAINTAINERS: add maintainer entry for thermal bindings Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:14:41 -0400 Message-ID: <52828C31.2050604@ti.com> References: <1384285582-16933-1-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> <1384285582-16933-21-git-send-email-eduardo.valentin@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="f56BqfqqbEW80qud7ROafavhrG6UELiBc" Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Olof Johansson Cc: Eduardo Valentin , Stephen Warren , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Rob Herring , Guenter Roeck , rui.zhang@intel.com, wni@nvidia.com, Grant Likely , durgadoss.r@intel.com, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ian Campbell List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --f56BqfqqbEW80qud7ROafavhrG6UELiBc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12-11-2013 15:59, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Eduardo Valentin > wrote: >> After discussion and agreement of thermal device tree bindings, >> it is desirable to properly maintain thermal bindings for >> existing and upcoming devices. >> >> As original author of thermal device tree bindings, I am >> volunteering to maintain them. >> >> Cc: Rob Herring >> Cc: Pawel Moll >> Cc: Mark Rutland >> Cc: Stephen Warren >> Cc: Ian Campbell >> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin >> --- >> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS >> index 3438384..94bfc46 100644 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@ -6178,6 +6178,7 @@ M: Pawel Moll >> M: Mark Rutland >> M: Stephen Warren >> M: Ian Campbell >> +M: Eduardo Valentin >> L: devicetree@vger.kernel.org >> S: Maintained >> F: Documentation/devicetree/ >=20 > The number of device-tree maintainers is getting to be somewhat silly. > You don't have to be a maintainer to be a reviewer, and the number is > getting large enough that it might get hard for one maintainer to know > what another is doing. >=20 > So, soft nack, but it's really up to the DT guys. Hello Olof, No issues on my side. As I stated in the patch description, I am volunteering. The motivation comes from the fact that it's been hard to get DT maintainers attention, so I am assuming they are not having enough bandwidth to pay attention to an extra class of bindings. I agree with you, this is up to the DT folks. >=20 >=20 > -Olof >=20 >=20 --=20 You have got to be excited about what you are doing. (L. Lamport) Eduardo Valentin --f56BqfqqbEW80qud7ROafavhrG6UELiBc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iF4EAREIAAYFAlKCjD4ACgkQCXcVR3XQvP2MdwD/SEGaGTglYxEMz7+GH81ShNQ9 /80YSr5UHanZY02HA7oA/R+SZ8lrWwyGFUYWzziqk4zsFmJseZciL7A7mmMgZtDf =TWz8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --f56BqfqqbEW80qud7ROafavhrG6UELiBc--