Re: [PATCH 01/23] dt-bindings: display: tegra: add bindings for Tegra20 VIP

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 18/11/2022 10:08, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
>   description: parallel video capture interface for the VI
> 
>>> +    type: object  
>>
>> Do you expect it to grow to more channels?
> 
> Not on Tegra20, it has one input only, but for other SoCs it's likely.
> Definitely some (including Tegra20 itself) have multiple CSI-2 inputs,
> and it's reasonable that this can apply to parallel input too.
> 
> Is this enough motivation to make room for more channels, or should I
> remove it since I have no plans to introduce support for other Tegra
> chips?

The best would be to add some more Tegra SoCs here, so that this @0
makes sense.

But I guess the block can be re-used in future, so it could also stay
like this.

> 
>>> +
>>> +    properties:
>>> +      reg: true  
>>
>> const: 0
>>
>>> +
>>> +      ports:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/ports
>>> +
>>> +        properties:
>>> +          port@0:
>>> +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
>>> +            description:
>>> +              Port receiving the video stream from the sensor
>>> +
>>> +          port@1:
>>> +            $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
>>> +            description:
>>> +              Port sending the video stream to the VI
>>> +
>>> +        required:
>>> +          - port@0
>>> +          - port@1
>>> +
>>> +    additionalProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +    required:
>>> +      - reg
>>> +      - ports
>>> +
>>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> +  - compatible
>>> +  - "#address-cells"
>>> +  - "#size-cells"
>>> +  - channel@0
>>> +
>>> +# see nvidia,tegra20-vi.yaml for an example  
>>
>> That file does not have this compatible. At least not on next-20221109.
> 
> It's added in patch 2. It's a chicken-egg problem, should I add a third
> patch that adds this line only?
> 
> ACK for all other comments you wrote.

It's ok.

Best regards,
Krzysztof