From: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@gmail.com>
To: zhangfei <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>,
dinguyen@altera.com, arnd@arndb.de, cjb@laptop.org,
jh80.chung@samsung.com, tgih.jun@samsung.com, heiko@sntech.de,
dianders@chromium.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com,
bzhao@marvell.com, rob.herring@calxeda.com, pawel.moll@arm.com,
mark.rutland@arm.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com,
mturquette@linaro.org
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 1/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add support to set the SDR and DDR timing through clock framework
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2013 21:16:39 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52AD1F17.5040708@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52AD0E7A.50208@linaro.org>
Hi Zhangfei,
On 12/14/13 8:05 PM, zhangfei wrote:
> Dear Dinh
>
> On 12/13/2013 04:30 AM, dinguyen@altera.com wrote:
>> From: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@altera.com>
>>
>> All implementations of the Synopsys DW SD/MMC IP have settings to
>> control
>> the phase shift of the CIU clk. These phase shift settings are
>> necessary for
>> the SD/MMC to correctly clock the card. All variants of the dw_mmc
>> will need
>> these settings, but how they are implemented can vastly vary.
>>
>> This patch enables the setting for the SDR and/or DDR settings
>> through the
>> common clock framework.
>>
>> Depends on the patch "mmc: dw_mmc: Enable the hold reg for certain
>> speed modes",
>> that is already reading the "samsung,dw-mshc-sdr-timing" and
>> "samsung,dw-mshc-ddr-timing" bindings, this patch saves those values
>> into a
>> u32 bitmask that can be passed to the clock framework to use.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@altera.com>
>> ---
>> v6: Add this patch
>> v5: none
>> v4: none
>> v3: none
>> v2: none
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 6 ++++++
>> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> index 480dafe..1fb5cff 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c
>> @@ -2431,6 +2431,8 @@ static struct dw_mci_board
>> *dw_mci_parse_dt(struct dw_mci *host)
>> if ((sdr_timing[1] == 0) || (ddr_timing[1] == 0))
>> pdata->cclk_in_drv = 0;
>>
>> + pdata->sdr_timing = (sdr_timing[1] | (sdr_timing[0] << 4));
>> + pdata->ddr_timing = (ddr_timing[1] | (ddr_timing[0] << 4));
>> return pdata;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -2478,6 +2480,27 @@ int dw_mci_probe(struct dw_mci *host)
>> dev_dbg(host->dev, "ciu clock not available\n");
>> host->bus_hz = host->pdata->bus_hz;
>> } else {
>> + /* If the CIU clk is available, we check for SDR and DDR
>> + * timing phase shift settings. But not all platforms
>> + * may have populated these settings, the driver will not fail
>> + * if these settings are not specified.
>> + */
>> + if (host->pdata->sdr_timing) {
>> + host->sdr_clk = devm_clk_get(host->dev, "sdr_mmc_clk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(host->sdr_clk))
>> + dev_dbg(host->dev, "sdr_mmc clock not available\n");
>> + else
>> + clk_set_rate(host->sdr_clk, host->pdata->sdr_timing);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (host->pdata->ddr_timing) {
>> + host->ddr_clk = devm_clk_get(host->dev, "ddr_mmc_clk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(host->ddr_clk))
>> + dev_dbg(host->dev, "ddr_mmc clock not available\n");
>> + else
>> + clk_set_rate(host->ddr_clk, host->pdata->ddr_timing);
>> + }
>> +
>
> Just curious, does pdata->sdr_timing and pdata->ddr_timing are fixed,
> fixed as each controller, or different with different board.
Yes, they are fixed for each controller per SoC.
> In case they are fixed, or fixed in each controller, and only required
> to be set in probe only once, maybe they can be hide in
> clk_mmc_ops.prepare
> And the clock can be used as ciu_clock, or parent of ciu_clock, which
> is called in dw_mmc.c, maybe these code can be ignored.
>
Please see v5 of this patch: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/3311121/
The issue with V5 was that there is no way for the dw_mmc driver to pass
the clock phase settings
in the clk_mmc_ops.prepare function.
>
>
>> ret = clk_prepare_enable(host->ciu_clk);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(host->dev, "failed to enable ciu clock\n");
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>> index 2b5b8bf..ad90ad1 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h
>> @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ struct mmc_data;
>> * @priv: Implementation defined private data.
>> * @biu_clk: Pointer to bus interface unit clock instance.
>> * @ciu_clk: Pointer to card interface unit clock instance.
>> + * @sdr_clk: Pointer to the SDR clock instance.
>> + * @ddr_clk: Pointer to the DDR clock instance.
>> * @slot: Slots sharing this MMC controller.
>> * @fifo_depth: depth of FIFO.
>> * @data_shift: log2 of FIFO item size.
>> @@ -170,6 +172,8 @@ struct dw_mci {
>> void *priv;
>> struct clk *biu_clk;
>> struct clk *ciu_clk;
>> + struct clk *sdr_clk;
>> + struct clk *ddr_clk;
>> struct dw_mci_slot *slot[MAX_MCI_SLOTS];
>>
>> /* FIFO push and pull */
>> @@ -241,6 +245,8 @@ struct dw_mci_board {
>> u32 caps2; /* More capabilities */
>> u32 pm_caps; /* PM capabilities */
>> u32 cclk_in_drv; /*cclk_in_drv phase shift */
>> + u32 sdr_timing; /* Single data rate timing setting. */
>> + u32 ddr_timing; /* Double data rate timing setting. */
>
> Are they fixed or not?
They are fixed values that is represented in the DTS bindings.
Dinh
>
> Thanks
> Zhangfei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-15 3:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-12 20:30 [PATCHv6 0/5] socfpga: Enable SD/MMC support dinguyen
2013-12-12 20:30 ` [PATCHv6 1/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add support to set the SDR and DDR timing through clock framework dinguyen
2013-12-15 2:05 ` zhangfei
2013-12-15 3:16 ` Dinh Nguyen [this message]
2013-12-15 4:37 ` zhangfei
[not found] ` <52AD320A.4030502-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-16 3:24 ` Dinh Nguyen
2013-12-16 3:38 ` Zhangfei Gao
2013-12-16 4:20 ` Seungwon Jeon
[not found] ` <1386880245-10192-1-git-send-email-dinguyen-EIB2kfCEclfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-12 20:30 ` [PATCHv6 2/5] clk: socfpga: Add a clock type for the SD/MMC driver dinguyen-EIB2kfCEclfQT0dZR+AlfA
2013-12-14 21:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-12-15 2:18 ` zhangfei
2013-12-15 4:51 ` Mike Turquette
2013-12-16 20:55 ` Emilio López
2013-12-16 21:06 ` Hans de Goede
2013-12-16 21:54 ` David Lanzendörfer
2013-12-18 20:10 ` Mike Turquette
2013-12-17 2:17 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2013-12-12 20:30 ` [PATCHv6 3/5] dts: socfpga: Add support for SD/MMC on the SOCFPGA platform dinguyen
2013-12-12 20:30 ` [PATCHv6 4/5] mmc: dw_mmc-socfpga: Remove the SOCFPGA specific platform for dw_mmc dinguyen
2013-12-12 20:30 ` [PATCHv6 5/5] ARM: socfpga_defconfig: enable SD/MMC support dinguyen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52AD1F17.5040708@gmail.com \
--to=dinh.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=dinguyen@altera.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=tgih.jun@samsung.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).