From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, paul@pwsan.com, tony@atomide.com,
rnayak@ti.com, bcousson@baylibre.com, mturquette@linaro.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv12 00/49] ARM: TI SoC clock DT conversion
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:36:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52CC2D01.7010001@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52CB72B3.6070709@ti.com>
On 01/06/2014 09:21 PM, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> Hi Tero,
> On 12/20/2013 10:34 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> Hopefully final post of this series. At least this is going to be the last
>> post this year as I will be going to x-mas vacation and won't be back before
>> Jan 2nd. This time I just sent the patches that have changes in them,
>> the missing ones are exactly the same as in v11.
>>
>
> There are still a few issues that I see
> [...]
>
>> Branches available at https://github.com/t-kristo/linux-pm.git:
>> - branch: 3.13-rc4-dt-clks-v12 : contains everything, shall me merged last
>> - branch: 3.13-rc4-dt-clks-v12-for-mike : drivers/clk changes
>> - branch: 3.13-rc4-dt-clks-v11-for-benoit : DT data only (from v11, no changes)
>
> For easy maintainer merging, you may want to make this as three branches:
>
> 1. for-mike based on
> git://git.linaro.org/people/mturquette/linux.git clk-next
>
> 2. for-benoit based on
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bcousson/linux-omap-dt.git
> for_3.14/dts
>
> 3. for-tony based on
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tmlind/linux-omap.git
> omap-for-v3.14/board-removal or on a clean k.org tag
>
> 4. A testing branch for the rest of us which consolidates all of these
> together.
>
> Testing with a rebase of 3.13-rc4-dt-clks-v12 to v3.13-rc7:
>
> Here is my test platforms and logs (boot only - omap2plus_defconfig +
> common_clk_debug - all boots to sd card based filesystem):
>
> AM335x Family:
>
> AM335x-EVMSK:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955459
> AM335x-EVM:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955460
> AM335x-BeagleBone Black:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955476
>
> OMAP3 family:
> OMAP3430: SDP3430:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955475
> AM3517-evm: (requires a bootargs fix - remote board - no regressions seen)
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955461
> AM3517-CraneBoard:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955477
> OMAP3630/DM3730 BeagleBoard-XM:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955474
> AM37xx-evm:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955472
>
> OMAP4 Family:
> OMAP4460: PandaBoard-ES:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955478
> NOTE: trace_clk_div_ck seems orphan clock here?
>
> OMAP5 Family:
> OMAP5432: OMAP5uEVM:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955479
>
> DRA7 Family:
>
> DRA7: DRA7-evm:
> http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955480
one more missing test platform:
AM43xx-epos platform: (needed a few out of tree patches to test on TI
internal engineering samples):
http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3960056
>
>
> Patch autoverification report: http://pastebin.mozilla.org/3955695
>
> The following issues need fixes I suppose:
> * CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment
> [PATCH 03/49] clk: divider: add support for registering divider
> [PATCH 04/49] clk: mux: add support for registering mux clock from
> [PATCH 05/49] clk: gate: add support for registering gate clock from
>
> * [PATCH 23/49] CLK: TI: DRA7: Add APLL support
> "parent_names = kzalloc(sizeof(char *) * init->num_parents, GFP_KERNEL);"
> * kzalloc without check for NULL
> * will also be good to add some kerneldoc documentation (same with
> interface.c)
> * WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const
> char * const
> [PATCH 25/49] CLK: TI: add am33xx clock init file
> [PATCH 27/49] CLK: TI: add omap3 clock init file
> * [PATCH 40/49] ARM: OMAP2+: clock: use driver API instead of direct
> adds a new kernel doc warning "Warning(arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock.c:
> No description found for parameter 'clk'"
> * [PATCH 44/49] ARM: OMAP2+: io: use new clock init API
> introduces warning for
> "arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c: warning: symbol 'omap_clk_soc_init' was
> not declared. Should it be static?"
> which seems squashed with "[PATCH 45/49] ARM: OMAP4: remove old clock
> data and link in new"
> will be good to have it not appear in patch 44 itself.
>
>
> Also pending is OMAP5 only build failure that Felipe reported and does
> not seem fixed in V12 as well:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138757010619274&w=2
> and
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138755595914796&w=2
>
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-07 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-20 16:34 [PATCHv12 00/49] ARM: TI SoC clock DT conversion Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 01/49] clk: add support for registering clocks from description Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 03/49] clk: divider: add support for registering divider clock from descriptor Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 04/49] clk: mux: add support for registering mux " Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 05/49] clk: gate: add support for registering gate " Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 06/49] clk: add support for low level register ops Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 07/49] clk: divider: add support for low level ops Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 08/49] clk: gate: " Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 09/49] clk: mux: " Tero Kristo
[not found] ` <1387557274-22583-1-git-send-email-t-kristo-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 11/49] CLK: ti: add init support for clock IP blocks Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 14/49] clk: ti: add composite clock support Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 18/49] CLK: TI: add support for clockdomain binding Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 12/49] CLK: TI: Add DPLL clock support Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 17/49] CLK: TI: add support for gate clock Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 23/49] CLK: TI: DRA7: Add APLL support Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 16:34 ` [PATCHv12 43/49] ARM: OMAP2+: PRM: add support for initializing PRCM clock modules from DT Tero Kristo
2013-12-20 18:37 ` [PATCHv12 00/49] ARM: TI SoC clock DT conversion Tony Lindgren
2013-12-20 20:06 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-12-20 20:10 ` Sebastian Reichel
2014-01-07 3:21 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-01-07 16:36 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52CC2D01.7010001@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mturquette@linaro.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).