From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 20:03:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52D2E716.8040403@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140112185337.GA6810@amd.pavel.ucw.cz>
On 12.01.2014 19:53, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Could we get some more descriptive names for the domains?
>>
>> They are listed like this in user's manual, e.g. DOMAIN_F, DOMAIN_I,
>> DOMAIN_G, etc.
>
> I guessed so. So the manual sucks. Would it be feasible to get it more
> descriptive (like "Domain_G (GPU)")?
Does the name really matter that much? I changed original ones in this
patch simply to make it easier to grep for domain related messages in
kernel output (e.g. dmesg | grep domain). It was not the main part of
this patch.
Also, there are multiple devices in most domains, so that would rather
end up being "Domain_I (JPEG, Cam I/F)", "Domain_P (2D, TV Enc.,
Scaler)", "Domain_F (Rot, Post, LCD)".
If you really insist, I can change this, but I fail to see what effect
it would really have.
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-12 19:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-11 19:42 [PATCH RFC 00/10] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain Tomasz Figa
2014-01-12 11:47 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-12 12:16 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-12 18:53 ` Pavel Machek
2014-01-12 19:03 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2014-01-12 19:24 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-12 19:20 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-12 19:25 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 02/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add always_on field to s3c64xx_pm_domain struct Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 03/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add pwr_stat bit for domain G Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up Tomasz Figa
2014-01-14 15:42 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87r48a8t99.fsf-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-20 16:24 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-23 0:32 ` Stephen Boyd
2014-01-16 16:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-20 17:32 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-22 11:00 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2014-01-23 0:18 ` Stephen Boyd
[not found] ` <20140123001802.GF13785-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-23 0:31 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-02-24 12:11 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-02-19 16:53 ` Philipp Zabel
2014-02-23 17:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-02-24 10:56 ` Philipp Zabel
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 05/10] ARM: exynos: Move to generic power domain bindings Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add device tree based power domain instantiation Tomasz Figa
2014-01-12 19:29 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20140112192910.GW29039-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-12 19:34 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-13 11:09 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-13 12:13 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-01-13 12:17 ` Mark Brown
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 07/10] ARM: s3c64xx: dt: Enable SoC-level power management Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 08/10] ARM: dts: s3c64xx: Add nodes for power domains Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 09/10] ARM: dts: s3c64xx: Add node for display controller Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:42 ` [PATCH RFC 10/10] ARM: dts: s3c6410-mini6410: Add support for LCD screen Tomasz Figa
2014-01-11 19:52 ` [PATCH RFC 00/10] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up Tomasz Figa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52D2E716.8040403@gmail.com \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=b.zolnierkie@samsung.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).