From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:55:11 -0800 Message-ID: <52D5B23F.3080807@codeaurora.org> References: <1389735034-21430-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140114214850.GQ29865@pd.tnic> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140114214850.GQ29865@pd.tnic> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Borislav Petkov Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, Mark Rutland , Russell King , Courtney Cavin , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Kumar Gala , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stepan Moskovchenko , David Brown List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 01/14/14 13:48, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:30:30PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> This patchset adds support for the Krait L1/L2 cache error detection >> hardware. The first patch adds the Krait l2 indirection >> register code. This patch is in need of an ACK from ARM folks. >> The next two patches add the driver and the binding and >> the final patch hooks it all up by adding the device tree node. >> >> I think Boris will pick up the first and third patches since they depend >> on each other. The final dts change could go through arm-soc via davidb's tree >> and the Documentation patch could go through the devicetree tree. Or patches 1 >> through 3 can go through Boris' tree. >> >> Changes since v4: >> * Prefixed l2 accessors functions with krait_ >> * Dropped first two patches as Boris says he picked them up > Hey Stephen, > > I'm going to send upstream only > > [PATCH v4 1/6] edac: Don't try to cancel workqueue when it's never setup > > as it is a clear bugfix. > > The second one > > [PATCH v4 2/6] genirq: export percpu irq functions for module usage > > will have to wait for when the driver goes in. But the driver depends on > "ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions" which still waits for > ACKs, right? > Ok that sounds fine. The ARM patch is fairly minor so I'm not sure if anyone is willing to ack it, but I'm willing to wait a little while to see if anyone will. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation