From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 10/10] ahci_imx: Port to library-ised ahci_platform Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:25:42 +0100 Message-ID: <52DF7276.5050705@redhat.com> References: <1390236303-22538-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1390236303-22538-11-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20140122065151.GC16215@pengutronix.de> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140122065151.GC16215-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Tejun Heo , Oliver Schinagl , Maxime Ripard , Richard Zhu , Roger Quadros , linux-ide-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 01/22/2014 07:51 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 05:45:03PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> This avoids the ugliness of creating a nested platform device from probe. >> >> Note untested, I've ordered a wandboard to be able to test these changes. > > Looks much better now, thanks. I could test this patch aswell, no need > to buy new hardware for this. Thanks for the offer, but the wandboard arrived yesterday. Having a bit more variety in the arm hardware I've to test with is good to have anyways. Regards, Hans