From: Michal Simek <monstr-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
To: monstr-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Michal Simek
<michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Wim Van Sebroeck <wim-IQzOog9fTRqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org>,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
"linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org"
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
"devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] watchdog: xilinx: Fix OF binding
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2014 09:01:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52EF4CCC.8020800@monstr.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52EF4C6F.8040701-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4391 bytes --]
On 02/03/2014 08:59 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 01/31/2014 06:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Michal Simek <michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Use of_property_read_u32 functions to clean OF probing.
>>
>> The subject is a bit misleading as this doesn't really fix anything.
>
> fair enough. Will change it.
>
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c | 25 ++++++++++---------------
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
>>> index c229cc4..475440a6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
>>> @@ -147,8 +147,7 @@ static u32 xwdt_selftest(struct xwdt_device *xdev)
>>> static int xwdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> {
>>> int rc;
>>> - u32 *tmptr;
>>> - u32 *pfreq;
>>> + u32 pfreq, enable_once;
>>> struct resource *res;
>>> struct xwdt_device *xdev;
>>> bool no_timeout = false;
>>> @@ -168,28 +167,24 @@ static int xwdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> if (IS_ERR(xdev->base))
>>> return PTR_ERR(xdev->base);
>>>
>>> - pfreq = (u32 *)of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node,
>>> - "clock-frequency", NULL);
>>> -
>>> - if (pfreq == NULL) {
>>> + rc = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "clock-frequency", &pfreq);
>>> + if (rc) {
>>> dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>>> "The watchdog clock frequency cannot be obtained\n");
>>> no_timeout = true;
>>
>> You can kill this...
>>
>>> }
>>>
>>> - tmptr = (u32 *)of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node,
>>> - "xlnx,wdt-interval", NULL);
>>> - if (tmptr == NULL) {
>>> + rc = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "xlnx,wdt-interval",
>>> + &xdev->wdt_interval);
>>> + if (rc) {
>>> dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>>> "Parameter \"xlnx,wdt-interval\" not found\n");
>>> no_timeout = true;
>>
>> and this...
>>
>>> - } else {
>>> - xdev->wdt_interval = *tmptr;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - tmptr = (u32 *)of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node,
>>> - "xlnx,wdt-enable-once", NULL);
>>> - if (tmptr == NULL) {
>>> + rc = of_property_read_u32(pdev->dev.of_node, "xlnx,wdt-enable-once",
>>> + &enable_once);
>>> + if (!rc && enable_once) {
>>> dev_warn(&pdev->dev,
>>> "Parameter \"xlnx,wdt-enable-once\" not found\n");
>>> watchdog_set_nowayout(xilinx_wdt_wdd, true);
>>> @@ -201,7 +196,7 @@ static int xwdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> */
>>> if (!no_timeout)
>>
>> and use "if (pfreq && xdev->wdt_interval)" if you initialize pfreq to 0.
>
>
> I just wanted to to change functions not logic in the driver.
> But it can be changed too.
>
>>> xilinx_wdt_wdd->timeout = 2 * ((1 << xdev->wdt_interval) /
>>> - *pfreq);
>>> + pfreq);
>>
>> Is the wdog really usable if the timeout properties are missing? Seems
>> like you should fail to probe rather than warn.
>
> There are 2 things.
> 1. timeout - you don't need pfreq and wdt_interval to use this driver
> but for that there should be module parameter timeout there.
> It should be added.
>
> 2. about warn - based on 1 I don't think driver should failed
> but I am looking at logic above which I have added there but should be different.
>
> u32 enable_once = 0;
> if (!rc)
> dev_warn
>
if (rc) here sorry.
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-03 8:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <ed4cb31c9a549343e6b492cf62fc962d39034bd0.1391177880.git.michal.simek@xilinx.com>
[not found] ` <ed4cb31c9a549343e6b492cf62fc962d39034bd0.1391177880.git.michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2014-01-31 14:18 ` [PATCH 07/10] watchdog: xilinx: Fix OF binding Michal Simek
2014-01-31 17:33 ` Rob Herring
2014-02-03 7:59 ` Michal Simek
[not found] ` <52EF4C6F.8040701-pSz03upnqPeHXe+LvDLADg@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-03 8:01 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2014-02-09 20:18 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-01-31 14:18 ` [PATCH 09/10] watchdog: xilinx: Add missing binding Michal Simek
2014-02-03 15:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-03 15:13 ` Michal Simek
2014-02-03 15:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-03 15:47 ` Michal Simek
2014-02-04 19:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-05 9:25 ` Michal Simek
2014-02-05 9:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-05 9:41 ` Michal Simek
2014-02-05 14:00 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52EF4CCC.8020800@monstr.eu \
--to=monstr-psz03upnqpehxe+lvdladg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=wim-IQzOog9fTRqzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).