From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: configuration of parent clocks and clock frequency Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:16:07 +0100 Message-ID: <52F0DA07.6050903@samsung.com> References: <52DE6CAB.10008@samsung.com> <20140201030614.9977.80501@quantum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <20140201030614.9977.80501@quantum> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Mike Turquette , Sylwester Nawrocki , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Tomasz Figa , Kyungmin Park , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 2014-02-01 04:06, Mike Turquette wrote: > Quoting Sylwester Nawrocki (2014-01-21 04:48:43) > > 5. Similarly to the regulator bindings the clock names could be appended > > to name of a DT property: > > > > [clk_name]-assigned-clock-parent = <...>; > > [clk_name]-assigned-clock-rate = <...>; > > I have always been partial to the way that the reg framework does its > [reg_name]-supply. We could shorten it to something like: > > [clk-name]-asn-parent = .... > [clk-name]-asn-rate = ... > > This is actually the format that was discussed at the ARM kernel summit > IIRC. I think that "[clk-name]-clk-parent" and "[clk-name]-clk-rate" will be a bit more descriptive names instead of quite ambiguous "asn". Best regards -- Marek Szyprowski, PhD Samsung R&D Institute Poland -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html