From: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
To: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@gmail.com>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>,
"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>,
rjw@rjwysocki.net, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
thomas.ab@samsung.com,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Add support for 'boost' mode OPP
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 10:51:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F11AA5.6060200@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuA9aimVcxwKEQnSNpsEhZ7Rf-74+r8FOz09EpAZcoVEdi6GA@mail.gmail.com>
On 02/04/2014 09:59 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
>> On 02/04/2014 03:41 AM, Thomas Abraham wrote:
>>> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>>
>>> Commit 6f19efc0 ("cpufreq: Add boost frequency support in core") adds
>>> support for CPU boost mode. This patch adds support for finding available
>>> boost OPPs from device tree and marking them as usable in boost mode.
>>>
>>> Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> Why is a cpufreq feature being pushed on to OPP library? you can very
>> well have a property boot-frequencies = < a b c > and be done with the
>> job.
>
> The boost-opp was not limited to be a cpu/cpufreq only feature. Any
> device (such as a bus) which has OPPs and if it can support optional
> boost OPPs, can utilize this feature. The boost OPPs also require a
> voltage to be associated with the frequency and hence the binding
> boost-frequencies would not be suffice. The code changes in this patch
> also do not have anything that is cpufreq specific.
>
if we have
operating-points = < Fa Va
Fb Vb
Fc Vc
Fd Vd
>;
boost-frequencies = <Fc Fd>;
you can easily pick up the voltages from the table.
The point being - there does not seem to be a need to modify the
existing definitions to introduce new OPP definitions.
a way to flip this over is to consider iMX6(see
arch/arm/mach-imx/mach-imx6q.) where OPP tuple <Fd Vd> can only be
enabled *iff* efuse register x has bit y set.
Would we want to introduce efuse offsets into OPP definitions? into
something like additional field definition 'efuse_controlled'?
>>
>> I agree with Rob's comment that this is something we have to discuss
>> in wider "add features to an OPP" discussion[1].
>
> Okay. I have read through the discussion in [1]. Thanks for the link.
> Assuming that the current OPP tuple format will not change, I do not
> feel the code changes in this patch will be hinder the outcome of the
> discussion in [1].
The context of that discussion is to consider what is the data form we
consider OPP as? should we consider OPP as a data that is extensible
(as in phandle with properties that we add on) OR should we consider
key, value pair which provides a key (frequency) into another table
for other data (like efuse bit map, boost set etc..).
Both approaches I mentioned will work, and will take additional code
to make it happen. But having custom properties like this limits
extensibility - that is not scalable for other property definitions
we'd like to make in the future.
>
> Regards,
> Thomas.
>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://marc.info/?t=139108946400001&r=1&w=2
>>
>>> drivers/base/power/opp.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> index 2553867..de4d52d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct dev_pm_opp {
>>> struct list_head node;
>>>
>>> bool available;
>>> + bool boost;
>>> unsigned long rate;
>>> unsigned long u_volt;
>>>
>>> @@ -380,10 +381,12 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(struct device *dev,
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
>>>
>>> /**
>>> - * dev_pm_opp_add() - Add an OPP table from a table definitions
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_add_flags() - Add an OPP to device OPP list with flags
>>> * @dev: device for which we do this operation
>>> * @freq: Frequency in Hz for this OPP
>>> * @u_volt: Voltage in uVolts for this OPP
>>> + * @available: initial availability of the OPP with adding it to the list.
>>> + * @boost: availability of this opp in controller's boost operating mode.
>>> *
>>> * This function adds an opp definition to the opp list and returns status.
>>> * The opp is made available by default and it can be controlled using
>>> @@ -395,7 +398,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor);
>>> * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
>>> * mutex cannot be locked.
>>> */
>>> -int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>> +static int dev_pm_opp_add_flags(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq,
>>> + unsigned long u_volt, bool available, bool boost)
>>> {
>>> struct device_opp *dev_opp = NULL;
>>> struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *new_opp;
>>> @@ -441,7 +445,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>> new_opp->dev_opp = dev_opp;
>>> new_opp->rate = freq;
>>> new_opp->u_volt = u_volt;
>>> - new_opp->available = true;
>>> + new_opp->available = available;
>>> + new_opp->boost = boost;
>>>
>>> /* Insert new OPP in order of increasing frequency */
>>> head = &dev_opp->opp_list;
>>> @@ -462,6 +467,27 @@ int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>> srcu_notifier_call_chain(&dev_opp->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp);
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_add() - Add an OPP table from a table definitions
>>> + * @dev: device for which we do this operation
>>> + * @freq: Frequency in Hz for this OPP
>>> + * @u_volt: Voltage in uVolts for this OPP
>>> + *
>>> + * This function adds an opp definition to the opp list and returns status.
>>> + * The opp is made available by default and it can be controlled using
>>> + * dev_pm_opp_enable/disable functions.
>>> + *
>>> + * Locking: The internal device_opp and opp structures are RCU protected.
>>> + * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
>>> + * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
>>> + * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
>>> + * mutex cannot be locked.
>>> + */
>>> +int dev_pm_opp_add(struct device *dev, unsigned long freq, unsigned long u_volt)
>>> +{
>>> + return dev_pm_opp_add_flags(dev, freq, u_volt, true, false);
>>> +}
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_add);
>>>
>>> /**
>>> @@ -651,7 +677,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_init_cpufreq_table(struct device *dev,
>>>
>>> list_for_each_entry(opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
>>> if (opp->available) {
>>> - freq_table[i].driver_data = i;
>>> + freq_table[i].driver_data =
>>> + opp->boost ? CPUFREQ_BOOST_FREQ : i;
>>> freq_table[i].frequency = opp->rate / 1000;
>>> i++;
>>> }
>>> @@ -701,19 +728,14 @@ struct srcu_notifier_head *dev_pm_opp_get_notifier(struct device *dev)
>>> }
>>>
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
>>> -/**
>>> - * of_init_opp_table() - Initialize opp table from device tree
>>> - * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs.
>>> - *
>>> - * Register the initial OPP table with the OPP library for given device.
>>> - */
>>> -int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>> +static int of_parse_opp_table(struct device *dev, const char *prop_name,
>>> + bool boost)
>>> {
>>> const struct property *prop;
>>> const __be32 *val;
>>> int nr;
>>>
>>> - prop = of_find_property(dev->of_node, "operating-points", NULL);
>>> + prop = of_find_property(dev->of_node, prop_name, NULL);
>>> if (!prop)
>>> return -ENODEV;
>>> if (!prop->value)
>>> @@ -734,7 +756,7 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>> unsigned long freq = be32_to_cpup(val++) * 1000;
>>> unsigned long volt = be32_to_cpup(val++);
>>>
>>> - if (dev_pm_opp_add(dev, freq, volt)) {
>>> + if (dev_pm_opp_add_flags(dev, freq, volt, true, boost)) {
>>> dev_warn(dev, "%s: Failed to add OPP %ld\n",
>>> __func__, freq);
>>> continue;
>>> @@ -744,5 +766,26 @@ int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>>
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> +
>>> +/**
>>> + * of_init_opp_table() - Initialize opp table from device tree
>>> + * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs.
>>> + *
>>> + * Register the initial OPP table with the OPP library for given device.
>>> + * Additional "boost" operating points of the controller, if any, are
>>> + * specified with "boost-opp" property.
>>> + */
>>> +int of_init_opp_table(struct device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = of_parse_opp_table(dev, "operating-points", false);
>>> + if (!ret) {
>>> + ret = of_parse_opp_table(dev, "boost-opp", true);
>>> + if (ret == -ENODEV)
>>> + ret = 0;
>>> + }
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_init_opp_table);
>>> #endif
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Nishanth Menon
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-04 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-04 9:41 [PATCH 0/2] Add device tree based lookup of boost mode OPPs Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04 9:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM / OPP: Add support for 'boost' mode OPP Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04 15:15 ` Nishanth Menon
2014-02-04 15:59 ` Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04 16:51 ` Nishanth Menon [this message]
2014-02-04 9:41 ` [PATCH 2/2] Documentation: devicetree: Add boost-opp binding to list boost mode OPPs Thomas Abraham
2014-02-04 14:02 ` Rob Herring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=52F11AA5.6060200@ti.com \
--to=nm@ti.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=l.majewski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=t.figa@samsung.com \
--cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).