From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: srinivas kandagatla Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ARM: STi: add stid127 soc support Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:48:24 +0000 Message-ID: <52F22508.7080706@st.com> References: <1391093744-19905-1-git-send-email-patrice.chotard@st.com> <201401301939.08302.arnd@arndb.de> <52EB96BB.6070800@st.com> <201401312115.33731.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201401312115.33731.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , kernel@stlinux.com, Linus Walleij , Patrice CHOTARD , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stuart Menefy , Rob Herring , Grant Likely , Giuseppe Cavallaro , maxime.coquelin@st.com, alexandre.torgue@st.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Arnd, On 31/01/14 20:15, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 31 January 2014, srinivas kandagatla wrote: > >>> Sorry if I missed the initial review, but can you explain >>> why this is needed to start with? >> >> On ST SoCs the default value for L2 AUX_CTRL register is 0x0, so we set >> the way-size explicit here. > > Unfortunately, we keep going back and forth on the L2 cache controller > setup between "it should work automatically" and "we don't want to > have configuration data in DT", where my personal opinion is that > the first one is more important here. > > Now, there are a couple of properties that are defined in > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/l2cc.txt to let some of the > things get set up automatically already. Can you check which bits > are missing there, if any? Are they better described as "configuration" > or "hardware" settings? Currently l2cc bindings has few optional properties like. - arm,data-latency - arm,tag-latency - arm,dirty-latency - arm,filter-ranges - interrupts : - cache-id-part: - wt-override: These does not include properties to set "way-size", "associativity", "enabling prefetching", "Prefetch drop enable", "prefetch offset", "Double linefill" and few more in prefect control register and aux-control register. This is not just a issue with STi SOCs, having a quick look, I can see that few more SOCs have similar requirements to set these properties. We could do two things to get l2 setup automatically on STi SOCS. 1> Either define these properties case-by-case basic, which might be useful for other SOCs too. 2> Or Add new compatible string for STi SoCs so that they can automatically setup these values in cache-l2x0.c Am Ok with either approaches. Thanks, srini > > Arnd > >