From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ohci-platform: Change compatible string from usb-ohci to ohci-platform Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 16:21:10 +0100 Message-ID: <52FA3FE6.8040308@redhat.com> References: <1392127826-31290-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <1392127826-31290-2-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <954E6E26-EEF1-4A0A-A9BC-D5CA918FAD43@codeaurora.org> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <954E6E26-EEF1-4A0A-A9BC-D5CA918FAD43-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Kumar Gala Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , devicetree , Florian Fainelli , linux-usb , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org, Alan Stern , Maxime Ripard , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Roger Quadros List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 02/11/2014 04:06 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2014, at 8:10 AM, Hans De Goede wrote: > >> The initial versions of the devicetree enablement patches for ohci-platform >> used "ohci-platform" as compatible string. However this was disliked by various >> reviewers because the platform bus is a Linux invention and devicetree is >> supposed to be OS agnostic. After much discussion I gave up and went with >> the generic usb-ohci as requested. >> >> In retro-spect I should have stuck to my guns, because the dts files for many >> existing boards already claim to be compatible with "usb-ohci", ie they have: >> >> compatible = "ti,ohci-omap3", "usb-ohci"; >> >> In theory this should not be a problem since the "ti,ohci-omap3" entry takes >> presedence, but in practice using a conflicting compatible string is an issue, >> because it makes which driver gets used depent on driver registration order. >> >> This patch changes the compatible string claimed by ohci-platform (back) to >> "ohci-platform", avoiding the driver registration / module loading ordering >> problems. Note that there already is a precedent for using ?hci-platform, in >> the form of xhci-platform.c using "xhci-platfrom" as compatible string. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ohci.txt | 4 ++-- >> drivers/usb/host/ohci-platform.c | 2 +- >> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ohci.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ohci.txt >> index 6933b0c..a8e576a 100644 >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ohci.txt >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/usb-ohci.txt >> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ >> USB OHCI controllers >> >> Required properties: >> -- compatible : "usb-ohci" > > Why not leave 'usb-ohci' and deprecate it? As it was introduced just a couple of days ago in linux-next, and has never seen the light in any released kernel. Regards, Hans