From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: Exynos: Add generic compatible string Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:21:36 +0100 Message-ID: <53076F00.7000001@samsung.com> References: <1392809645-631-1-git-send-email-sachin.kamat@linaro.org> <53075239.4010603@samsung.com> <2200834.G3JJLYQl5i@wuerfel> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <2200834.G3JJLYQl5i@wuerfel> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Sachin Kamat , linux-arm-kernel , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Kukjin Kim , Ian Campbell , Rob Herring , Grant Likely , linux-samsung-soc , Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 21.02.2014 15:48, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 21 February 2014 14:18:49 Tomasz Figa wrote: >> >>> Now that we have a broader agreement on this, I think we can go ahead with the >>> following steps as an initial approach: >>> 1. Have a common machine file for both exynos4 and 5 files, mach-exynos-dt.c. >>> 2. Introduce a generic compatible string "samsung,exynos". >>> 3. Append this to the compatible property list for existing boards. >>> >>> If this plan looks OK, I can send across patches doing this. >>> >> >> Looks good. I would also merge common.c with this resulting >> mach-exynos-dt.c, as it would be the only user of the code there. > > Sounds good. While the naming is not important, I would just call the > file 'exynos.c', in line with some of the other platforms we have. > Both the 'mach-' and the '-dt' part of the file name are redundant. > > Alternatively, you could merge it all into common.c. exynos.c sounds good to me. Best regards, Tomasz