From: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@dowhile0.org>
Cc: "Tomi Valkeinen" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>,
"Benoît Cousson" <bcousson@baylibre.com>,
"Tony Lindgren" <tony@atomide.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Ash Charles" <ash@gumstix.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: duovero-parlor: Add HDMI output
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 14:05:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <530C9516.7070501@epfl.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140225123921.GY27282@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Hi,
On 02/25/2014 01:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 05:22:27PM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
>> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 06:07:49PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>>>> + hdmi0: connector@0 {
>>>> + compatible = "hdmi-connector";
>>>
>>> This looks way to generic a compatible string. Are you sure it's
>>> correct?
>>>
>>
>> That compatible string is correct according to the latest series
>> posted by Tomi Valkeinen to add DT bindings for the OMAP Display
>> SubSystem (DSS) [0].
>
> in which case:
>
> N N AA CCCC K K
> NN N A A C C K K
> N N N A A C KK
> N N N AAAAAA C KK
> N NN A A C C K K
> N N A A CCCC K K
>
What a nice nack.
> Yes, that's a very big nack. Two things:
>
> 1. OMAP really doesn't have the right to define a compatible string which
> is as generic as "hdmi-connector".
>
> 2. Even with "omapdss," before it, the convention that DT people have adopted
> is for the prefix to be "companyname," and not a subsystem.
>
> I'm not the only one with this concern - I discussed it with Arnd last
> night and his comments were about it being "obviously bogus".
>
I agree. It should probably be "ti,omapdss-hdmi-connector", or simply
"ti,hdmi-connector", if any.
>> The property is added on this patch [1] and as far as I understood the
>> idea is that it could be a generic DT binding that can be used by
>> platform specific HDMI connectors like the omap dss HDMI connector [2].
>
> Why do the physical connectors need a DT binding? Surely what needs the
> DT binding is the HDMI encoder - and that certainly should no way be a
> generic name, because there's no such thing as a generic HDMI encoder
> chip.
>
The HDMI IP is declared in omap4.dtsi, with the compatible
"ti,omap4-hdmi". The code of the HDMI connector [1] seems to mainly call
ops of the connected endpoint, so it seems to act as a logical
termination in the DSS chain, but I may be wrong.
Regards,
Florian
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/tomba/linux.git/tree/drivers/video/omap2/displays-new/connector-hdmi.c?h=work%2Fdss-dt-review-3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-25 13:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-24 17:07 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: dts: OMAP4: Add support for DuoVero/Parlor Florian Vaussard
2014-02-24 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: Add support for OMAP4 Gumstix DuoVero/Parlor Florian Vaussard
2014-03-03 10:08 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-03-04 18:17 ` Tony Lindgren
2014-02-24 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: duovero-parlor: Add HDMI output Florian Vaussard
2014-02-24 18:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-24 20:22 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2014-02-25 7:54 ` Florian Vaussard
2014-02-25 12:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-25 13:05 ` Florian Vaussard [this message]
[not found] ` <20140225123921.GY27282-l+eeeJia6m9vn6HldHNs0ANdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-25 13:41 ` Sebastian Reichel
2014-02-25 16:51 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-02-25 20:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-26 11:14 ` Tomi Valkeinen
[not found] ` <530DCC8A.6060708-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-02-26 12:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-26 12:44 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-02-26 13:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-26 14:35 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-03-06 23:29 ` Laurent Pinchart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=530C9516.7070501@epfl.ch \
--to=florian.vaussard@epfl.ch \
--cc=ash@gumstix.com \
--cc=bcousson@baylibre.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=javier@dowhile0.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).