From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ARM: dts: tegra: add PCIe interrupt mapping properties Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:27:24 -0700 Message-ID: <5310F12C.7030500@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1393608523-17509-1-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> <1393608523-17509-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1393608523-17509-2-git-send-email-l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-tegra-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lucas Stach , Bjorn Helgaas , Thierry Reding Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-samsung-soc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-sh-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Simon Horman , Shawn Guo , Kukjin Kim , Mark Rutland , Jingoo Han , Ben Dooks , Tim Harvey , Richard Zhu , Arnd Bergmann , kernel-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 02/28/2014 10:28 AM, Lucas Stach wrote: > Those are defined by the common PCI binding. I have no reason to object to the two Tegra patches, but I'll wait for Thierry to take a closer look. I expect once he does, I would apply patch 1/7 through the Tegra tree, and Bjorn would take patch 2/7 through the PCI tree. Does that make sense?