From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] USB Host support for OMAP5 uEVM Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:16:23 +0200 Message-ID: <531EFE97.1090202@ti.com> References: <1393510711-4697-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <531ECDCB.4060700@ti.com> <20140311120259.GI21216@lee--X1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140311120259.GI21216@lee--X1> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones Cc: tony@atomide.com, bcousson@baylibre.com, balbi@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 03/11/2014 02:02 PM, Lee Jones wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> This patchset brings up USB Host ports and Ethernet port on >>> the OMAP5 uEVM board. >>> >>> It also does some cleanup with respect to DT clock binding >>> for the mfd/omap-usb-host driver. >>> >>> Please queue these for -next. >>> >>> Lee, >>> >>> I've folded some platform data dependent patches with mfd patches >>> so that they don't break functionality when applied individually. >>> You can safely pull in all MFD patches (1 to 6). >>> >>> Tony & Benoit, >>> >>> Can you please accept patches 7, 8 and 9? >> >> Tony has already picked up 7,8 and 9 through omap-soc tree. >> >> Since you acked most patches except 5 and 6, are you fine if Tony takes >> all the patches 1 to 4 in this series via omap-soc tree? >> >> What about patches 5 and 6? > > Any patches which are orthogonal can just be sucked into whichever tree > they belong in. If there are inter-subsystem dependencies I'd prefer > to take them and issue a immutable branch pull-request to the other > maintainers. > Awesome. That would be great, thanks. cheers, -roger