From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] Add STiH407 SoC and reference board support Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:26:26 +0100 Message-ID: <53207CA2.4090309@st.com> References: <1394614210-15698-1-git-send-email-maxime.coquelin@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Rob Landley , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Srinivas Kandagatla , Stuart Menefy , Giuseppe Cavallaro , "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , kernel@stlinux.com, Lee Jones List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Linus, On 03/12/2014 03:20 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Maxime COQUELIN wrote: > >> This series adds basic support to the STMicroelectronics STiH407 SoC and its >> B2120 reference board. The STiH407 is a dual-core ARM Cortex-A9 CPU aimed at >> STB market. >> >> Changes since v3: > > I've applied the pinctrl changes to the pinctrl tree, please push all the > DTS[i] changes through ARM SoC. As mentioned in the cover-letter, the DTS changes are based on arm_soc's for-next branch. Do you mean I should send a pull request for these three patches? > > There is no need to keep DTS and subsystem changes in sync as > the DTS'es are supposed to be maintained in separation in the > future anyway. > Understood. Thanks, Maxime > Yours, > Linus Walleij >