From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Dooks Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: add audio dmac node Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2014 14:58:49 +0100 Message-ID: <53440099.5010002@codethink.co.uk> References: <1396901229-29117-1-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <1396901229-29117-7-git-send-email-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> <53430CFC.7000107@cogentembedded.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53430CFC.7000107@cogentembedded.com> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Sergei Shtylyov , linux-kernel@lists.codethink.co.uk, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org Cc: vinod.koul@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, magnus.damm@opensource.se, horms@verge.net.au, g.liakhovetski@gmx.d, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/04/14 21:39, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 04/08/2014 12:07 AM, Ben Dooks wrote: > >> Add initial audio dmac node and resources. > >> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks >> --- >> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi | 68 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi >> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi >> index 2c8cbbd..6032783 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi >> @@ -176,6 +176,74 @@ >> }; >> }; >> >> + dma1: dma-mux@1 { >> + compatible = "renesas,shdma-mux"; >> + #dma-cells = <1>; >> + dma-channels = <20>; >> + dma-requests = <256>; >> + #address-cells = <2>; >> + #size-cells = <2>; >> + ranges; >> + >> + audiodma0: dmac@ec700000 { > > According to the ePARR standard [1], the node name should be > "dma-controller", not just "dmac". > >> + compatible = "renesas,dma-r8a7790", "renesas,dma-arm"; >> + clocks = <&mstp5_clks R8A7790_CLK_AUDIO_DMAC0>; >> + dma-channels = <13>; >> + status = "disabled"; >> + reg = <0 0xec700020 0 0xffc0>; >> + interrupt-parent = <&gic>; > > Shouldn't it be just inherited from the top level node? Thanks, it should be in this case and forgot to remove it. -- Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius