From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-43101.protonmail.ch (mail-43101.protonmail.ch [185.70.43.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D21B53537F8; Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:25:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.101 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786559151; cv=none; b=ABGqUvssWpu/Ppzm7eLhI3mjuMR9/DhxdgPNBtr7RQY1vKYvzaOORSr5qU64pgPZBV8Pa+DIkkNzAsKee2reXyV26kCF+Cz/ArMw1ODOOZkDpbH130CL+4TFkudk3AI0EAJH8XlSsQM7dX3bVjzLGwv5X6LjFhb9E9aGt6FRxqc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1786559151; c=relaxed/simple; bh=3qSRwzR3JEdp5YTFpIXaGvrYn94zGrD09f4WwzMWHj8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ipdBOXnBTjFKr3SiABV/f3vfDJvtrc3b5zqkuY6avIQ6b1AkOYJAR5AsAuAo/uyyC0PoEfWpOr1BiKKSRsGUDYm2dnRpHP1KnyQ0LzVbx/iOOKP8SV/lg5sebOWxQn4R325/qNG20ayrNEZcvVKTkBxWRivOdoTNkNY8gndzdvw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b=mjHZeJyE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=185.70.43.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=proton.me Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=proton.me header.i=@proton.me header.b="mjHZeJyE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=proton.me; s=q3m3hbagmrgxdgkyzjodnq23ue.protonmail; t=1786559144; x=1786818344; bh=3qSRwzR3JEdp5YTFpIXaGvrYn94zGrD09f4WwzMWHj8=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector; b=mjHZeJyE9jvglEcRMGg4bkmkpriFlKPNG3W25b7jaHxMX4xS6tRx0Jbdzs7YD8uWp cK6h/9w5kv2ZjKDb2yuUeHSIYGMt59YcNaCCtEpwNvHnrImBU6Fmw6QoH7Q8hzHrHa 37O90I5frMnVy72mw/2fHd3+XWsC8IziORlCr35Yb0qWqVIje/WYnONXHvXxJ1MThG HJ0QBOz8kljWmWnokZqt4dCWmXPz02zoJtSoUxjFURdKTlOvS+1ReEBQQEDCASrry/ bNat0PFmVa85usdccjSEsUsBjGYQjmGjpLZKZ+wGbEVvQ08T1W1sj052bHjo7bgT8U uqxhWy92hQREA== Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 18:25:40 +0000 To: Bartosz Golaszewski From: Esteban Urrutia Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Andersson , Linus Walleij , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Vinod Koul , Esteban Urrutia via B4 Relay Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] pinctrl: qcom: sm8450: Remove duplicate reference to gpio81 Message-ID: <534a56f8-c6dd-4196-aed1-c5327ac1c848@proton.me> In-Reply-To: References: <20260802-sm8475-tlmm-v2-0-a93e1d1cb53b@proton.me> <20260802-sm8475-tlmm-v2-1-a93e1d1cb53b@proton.me> Feedback-ID: 147889766:user:proton X-Pm-Message-ID: 67caa6ade212f07ee4c79559ec70da7164b2c875 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/12/26 4:15 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > I - and many other maintainers - find it useful. It seems like there'll b= e > a v3 anyway, so what's the problem? No problem with it, just didn't know Fixes tag can be used in this scenario as well. With that said: Fixes: 4beb02f19c37 ("pinctrl: qcom: Add SM8450 pinctrl driver") Regards, Esteban