From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/17] ARM: sunxi: Add driver for SD/MMC hosts found on Allwinner sunxi SoCs Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:17:30 +0200 Message-ID: <53565DDA.9020202@redhat.com> References: <1398164497-14212-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> <53565B74.4000703@elopez.com.ar> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53565B74.4000703-0Z03zUJReD5OxF6Tv1QG9Q@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?RW1pbGlvIEzDs3Bleg==?= , Mike Turquette Cc: Chris Ball , Ulf Hansson , =?UTF-8?B?RGF2aWQgTGFuemVuZMO2cmZlcg==?= , Maxime Ripard , linux-mmc-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, devicetree , linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 04/22/2014 02:07 PM, Emilio L=C3=B3pez wrote: > Hi Hans, >=20 > El 22/04/14 08:01, Hans de Goede escribi=C3=B3: >> Hi All, >> >> Here is v8 of the sunxi-mmc patch-set David Lanzend=C3=B6rfer and I have= been >> working on. >> >> The first 2 patches are depenencies which should go in through the clk t= ree, >> Mike can you pick these 2 up please ? : >> >> "clk: sunxi: factors: automatic reparenting support" >> Is uncontroversial and has been favorably reviewed by various people. >=20 > I'll pick this one up for 3.16 if you're ok with that. Mike, let me know = if you have any objection to the patch, but I'm pretty sure you (informally= ?) acked it in the past. >=20 >> "clk: sunxi: Implement MMC phase control" >> Is somewhat more controversial as there has been lots of discussion abou= t >> adding a generic phase control method to the clk framework. The problem = is >> that there has been a lot of talk about such a generic phase control met= hod >> but not a single patch. Therefor I would like to move forwards with usin= g >> a platform specific method for now. I hereby promise that once we've a g= eneric >> method I'll write patches to convert the sunxi code to that method. >=20 > Mike proposed a RFC for handling this better, and there were talks with A= llwinner people to see what did these phase controls actually mean. We shou= ld be able to get a proper solution for it during this cycle. I'd prefer to= work towards that instead of merging this, as we have more than a month to= get it ready still. A month will be gone before you know it, and merging sunxi mmc support real= ly is long overdue, and is the last thing keeping distros from shipping with s= unxi support ootb. So I would really prefer to just get this merged as is for no= w, changing it later should be easy, and merging an interim solution will make some more time for doing the generic clk phase control method properly. Regards, Hans --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.