From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Capella Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/6] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 16:28:28 -0700 Message-ID: <536c131d.43d7440a.1d61.ffff95ca@mx.google.com> References: <1399399483-17112-1-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <1399399483-17112-2-git-send-email-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <536ac4ef.6ae7440a.511a.ffffdef8@mx.google.com> <20140508085743.GA12860@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140508085743.GA12860@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Daniel Lezcano , Vincent Guittot , Kevin Hilman , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Sebastian Capella , Catalin Marinas , Peter De Schrijver , Nicolas Pitre , Stephen Boyd , Amit Kucheria , Rob Herring , Santosh Shilimkar , Antti Miettinen , Sudeep Holla , "grant.likely@linaro.org" , Tomasz Figa , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Charles Garcia-Tobin List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-05-08 01:57:43) > On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:43:04AM +0100, Sebastian Capella wrote: > > Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-05-06 11:04:38) > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..196ef52 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/idle-states.txt > > > @@ -0,0 +1,508 @@ ... > > > + > > > +The nodes describing the idle states (state) can only be defined within the > > > +idle-states node. > > > + > > > +Any other configuration is consider invalid and therefore must be ignored. > > > > consider -> considered > > must be -> shall? > > > > Is the reference to "any other configuration" referring to state nodes > > not in the idle states node? If so, maybe this sentence should go > > together with that one. > > Yes, it makes sense. > With this small change you can add my Reviewed-by Thanks! Sebastian