From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Holler Subject: Re: [PATCH] deps: introduce new (virtual) property no-dependencies Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:02:19 +0200 Message-ID: <537314FB.1020905@ahsoftware.de> References: <537151FF.8070104@ahsoftware.de> <1400006923-7950-1-git-send-email-holler@ahsoftware.de> <5372CD15.5020001@ahsoftware.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5372CD15.5020001-SXC+2es9fhnfWeYVQQPykw@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org Cc: Jon Loeliger List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Am 14.05.2014 03:55, schrieb Alexander Holler: > Am 13.05.2014 20:48, schrieb Alexander Holler: >> >> The property 'no-dependencies' is virtual property and will not be added >> to any output file. >> > Hmm, I think it should be non-virtual, otherwise a dtb isn't > reproducible. That means dtc -> dtb -> dts (fdtdump) -> dtb would > produce a different dtb if no-dependencies was used to avoid an > automatic dependency. But a dtb doesn't have phandles. After all that's why I had to introduce the property dependencies. So no-dependencies doesn't make sense in a .dtb, the virtual nature of no-dependencies makes sense and the patch is fine. Looks like I had a weak moment yesterday evening. ;) Regards, Alexander Holler -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html