From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Guenter Roeck Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] OF: Introduce DT overlay support. Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 06:18:58 -0700 Message-ID: <53736D42.1010302@roeck-us.net> References: <1396615441-29630-1-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <1396615441-29630-3-git-send-email-pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> <20140514100856.5198DC4153D@trevor.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Geert Uytterhoeven , Grant Likely Cc: Pantelis Antoniou , Rob Herring , Stephen Warren , Matt Porter , Koen Kooi , Alison Chaiken , Dinh Nguyen , Jan Lubbe , Alexander Sverdlin , Michael Stickel , Dirk Behme , Alan Tull , Sascha Hauer , Michael Bohan , Ionut Nicu , Michal Simek , Matt Ranostay , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Pete Popov , Dan Malek , Georgi Vlaev List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/14/2014 06:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Grant Likely > wrote: >>> +config OF_OVERLAY >>> + bool "OF overlay support" >>> + depends on OF >>> + select OF_DYNAMIC >>> + select OF_DEVICE >>> + select OF_RESOLVE >>> + help >>> + OpenFirmware overlay support. Allows you to modify on runtime the >>> + live tree using overlays. >> >> Should not be a user-visable option. Drivers using it should select it > > Why not? It's up to the (final) user to use it, or not. > >> or otherwise cause it to be enabled. > > Why should this be driver-specific? Shouldn't this just work with all drivers? > It does once enabled. I think what Grant refers to is that there has to be a driver which implements the actual overlay insertion and removal (ie calls the new API functions), and that the Kconfig option for this driver should select OF_OVERLAY instead of depending on it. Guenter