* [PATCH 0/2] ARM: tegra: initial support for Colibri T30 @ 2014-05-13 17:27 stefan 2014-05-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: enable MCP251x CAN controller and DS1307 RTC stefan 2014-05-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 stefan 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: stefan @ 2014-05-13 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: swarren, thierry.reding Cc: devicetree, linux, linux-kernel, stefan, marcel, linux-tegra, linux-arm-kernel From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> This patches cooked a while in our repository and is now quite complete. All is tested on several Colibri T30 modules and evaluation boards by Marcel and me. The device tree is splitted into a module part and the carrier board. The former is then included by the latter (in this case the evaluation board). The comments "Colibri: " represent the SO-DIMM Pin name as defined in the Colibri standard, and should be helpful for users adopting the device tree for other carrier boards. Stefan Agner (2): ARM: tegra: enable MCP251x CAN controller and DS1307 RTC ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts | 202 ++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi | 375 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 6 + 4 files changed, 584 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi -- 1.9.2 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: enable MCP251x CAN controller and DS1307 RTC 2014-05-13 17:27 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: tegra: initial support for Colibri T30 stefan @ 2014-05-13 17:27 ` stefan [not found] ` <77cfca0a1769d867c8d2919f0040fbd785940fef.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> 2014-05-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 stefan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: stefan @ 2014-05-13 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: swarren, thierry.reding Cc: devicetree, linux, linux-kernel, stefan, marcel, linux-tegra, linux-arm-kernel From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> Toradex Colibri Evaluation Board uses the DS1307 RTC and the MCP251x CAN controller. The NVIDIA Tegra 3 based Colibri T30 module can be used on this carrier board, hence enable those drivers in tegra_defonfig. Furthermore the NVIDIA Tegra 3 based Apalis T30 module too contains two MCP251x CAN controller. Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> --- arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig index 2926281..6329632 100644 --- a/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig +++ b/arch/arm/configs/tegra_defconfig @@ -73,6 +73,11 @@ CONFIG_INET6_IPCOMP=y CONFIG_IPV6_MIP6=y CONFIG_IPV6_TUNNEL=y CONFIG_IPV6_MULTIPLE_TABLES=y +CONFIG_CAN=y +CONFIG_CAN_RAW=y +CONFIG_CAN_BCM=y +CONFIG_CAN_DEV=y +CONFIG_CAN_MCP251X=y CONFIG_BT=y CONFIG_BT_RFCOMM=y CONFIG_BT_BNEP=y @@ -222,6 +227,7 @@ CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_TRANSIENT=y CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGER_CAMERA=y CONFIG_RTC_CLASS=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_AS3722=y +CONFIG_RTC_DRV_DS1307=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_MAX8907=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_PALMAS=y CONFIG_RTC_DRV_TPS6586X=y -- 1.9.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <77cfca0a1769d867c8d2919f0040fbd785940fef.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: enable MCP251x CAN controller and DS1307 RTC [not found] ` <77cfca0a1769d867c8d2919f0040fbd785940fef.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-05-13 19:57 ` Stephen Warren 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2014-05-13 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y, thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, marcel-mitwqZ+T+m9Wk0Htik3J/w On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org wrote: > From: Stefan Agner <stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> > > Toradex Colibri Evaluation Board uses the DS1307 RTC and the > MCP251x CAN controller. The NVIDIA Tegra 3 based Colibri T30 > module can be used on this carrier board, hence enable those > drivers in tegra_defonfig. > > Furthermore the NVIDIA Tegra 3 based Apalis T30 module too > contains two MCP251x CAN controller. I have squashed this patch into Tegra's for-3.16/defconfig branch. Can you please also send a patch to enable the same options in multi_v7_defconfig. Send that to arm-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org (it's an alias for the armsoc tree maintainers). That will ensure that anyone using that config will also get these changes. Thanks. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 2014-05-13 17:27 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: tegra: initial support for Colibri T30 stefan 2014-05-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: enable MCP251x CAN controller and DS1307 RTC stefan @ 2014-05-13 17:27 ` stefan [not found] ` <d45ec5351ce8ef03256061bdc4b0ba673bd40c66.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: stefan @ 2014-05-13 17:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: swarren, thierry.reding Cc: devicetree, linux, linux-kernel, stefan, marcel, linux-tegra, linux-arm-kernel From: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> This patch adds the device tree to support Toradex Colibri T30, a computer on module which can be used on different carrier boards. The module consists of a Tegra 30 SoC, two PMIC, DDR3L RAM, eMMC, a LM95245 temperature sensor and an AX88772B USB Ethernet Controller. Furthermore, there is a STMPE811 and SGTL5000 audio codec which are not yet supported. Anything that is not self contained on the module is disabled by default. The device tree for the Evaluation Board includes the modules device tree and enables the supported pheripherials of the carrier board (the Evaluation Board supports almost all of them). Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch> --- arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 + arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts | 202 ++++++++++++++ arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi | 375 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 578 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile index 35c146f..9e9669c 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA) += tegra20-harmony.dtb \ tegra30-beaver.dtb \ tegra30-cardhu-a02.dtb \ tegra30-cardhu-a04.dtb \ + tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dtb \ tegra114-dalmore.dtb \ tegra124-venice2.dtb dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE) += versatile-ab.dtb \ diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f1fb0de --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts @@ -0,0 +1,202 @@ +/dts-v1/; + +#include "tegra30-colibri.dtsi" + +/ { + model = "Toradex Colibri T30 on Colibri Evaluation Board"; + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-eval-v3", "nvidia,tegra30"; + + aliases { + rtc0 = "/i2c@7000c000/rtc@68"; + rtc1 = "/i2c@7000d000/tps65911@2d"; + rtc2 = "/rtc@7000e000"; + }; + + host1x@50000000 { + dc@54200000 { + rgb { + status = "okay"; + nvidia,panel = <&panel>; + }; + }; + hdmi@54280000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + }; + + serial@70006000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + serial@70006040 { + compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-hsuart"; + status = "okay"; + }; + + serial@70006300 { + compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-hsuart"; + status = "okay"; + }; + + pwm@7000a000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + /* + * GEN1_I2C: I2C_SDA/SCL on SODIMM pin 194/196 (e.g. RTC on carrier + * board) + */ + i2c@7000c000 { + status = "okay"; + clock-frequency = <100000>; + + /* M41T0M6 real time clock on carrier board */ + rtc@68 { + compatible = "stm,m41t00"; + reg = <0x68>; + }; + }; + + /* DDC_CLOCK/DATA on X3 pin 15/16 (e.g. display EDID) */ + hdmiddc: i2c@7000c700 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */ + spi@7000d400 { + status = "okay"; + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>; + can0: can@0 { + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515"; + reg = <0>; + clocks = <&clk16m>; + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>; + }; + spidev0: spi@1 { + compatible = "spidev"; + reg = <1>; + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>; + }; + }; + + sdhci@78000200 { + status = "okay"; + bus-width = <4>; + cd-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(C, 7) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + no-1-8-v; + }; + + /* EHCI instance 0: USB1_DP/N -> USBC_P/N */ + usb@7d000000 { + status = "okay"; + dr_mode = "otg"; + }; + + usb-phy@7d000000 { + status = "okay"; + dr_mode = "otg"; + vbus-supply = <&usbc_vbus_reg>; + }; + + /* EHCI instance 2: USB3_DP/N -> USBH_P/N */ + usb@7d008000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + usb-phy@7d008000 { + status = "okay"; + vbus-supply = <&usbh_vbus_reg>; + }; + + backlight: backlight { + compatible = "pwm-backlight"; + + /* PWM<A> */ + pwms = <&pwm 0 5000000>; + brightness-levels = <255 128 64 32 16 8 4 0>; + default-brightness-level = <6>; + /* BL_ON */ + enable-gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(V, 2) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + }; + + clocks { + clk16m: clk@1 { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + reg=<1>; + #clock-cells = <0>; + clock-frequency = <16000000>; + clock-output-names = "clk16m"; + }; + }; + + gpio-keys { + compatible = "gpio-keys"; + + power { + label = "Power"; + gpios = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(V, 1) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + linux,code = <KEY_POWER>; + debounce-interval = <10>; + gpio-key,wakeup; + }; + }; + + panel: panel { + compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel"; + + backlight = <&backlight>; + }; + + pwmleds { + compatible = "pwm-leds"; + + pwmb { + label = "PWM<B>"; + pwms = <&pwm 1 19600>; + max-brightness = <255>; + }; + pwmc { + label = "PWM<C>"; + pwms = <&pwm 2 19600>; + max-brightness = <255>; + }; + pwmd { + label = "PWM<D>"; + pwms = <&pwm 3 19600>; + max-brightness = <255>; + }; + }; + + regulators { + sys_5v0_reg: regulator@1 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + reg = <1>; + regulator-name = "5v0"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + usbc_vbus_reg: regulator@2 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + reg = <2>; + regulator-name = "usbc_vbus"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; + vin-supply = <&sys_5v0_reg>; + }; + + /* USBH_PEN */ + usbh_vbus_reg: regulator@3 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + reg = <3>; + regulator-name = "usbh_vbus"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>; + gpio = <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(W, 2) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; + vin-supply = <&sys_5v0_reg>; + }; + }; +}; diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a496335 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi @@ -0,0 +1,375 @@ +#include <dt-bindings/input/input.h> +#include "tegra30.dtsi" + +/* + * Toradex Colibri T30 Device Tree + * Compatible for Revisions 1.1B/1.1C/1.1D + */ +/ { + model = "Toradex Colibri T30"; + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-v11b", + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11c", + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11d", + "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30"; + + aliases { + serial0 = &uarta; + serial1 = &uartd; + serial2 = &uartb; + }; + + memory { + reg = <0x80000000 0x40000000>; + }; + + host1x@50000000 { + hdmi@54280000 { + vdd-supply = <&sys_3v3_reg>; + pll-supply = <&vio_reg>; + + nvidia,hpd-gpio = + <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(N, 7) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + nvidia,ddc-i2c-bus = <&hdmiddc>; + }; + }; + + pinmux@70000868 { + pinctrl-names = "default"; + pinctrl-0 = <&state_default>; + + state_default: pinmux { + /* Colibri BL_ON */ + pv2 { + nvidia,pins = "pv2"; + nvidia,function = "rsvd4"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + + /* Colibri Backlight PWM<A> */ + sdmmc3_dat3_pb4 { + nvidia,pins = "sdmmc3_dat3_pb4"; + nvidia,function = "pwm0"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + + /* Colibri CAN_INT */ + kb_row8_ps0 { + nvidia,pins = "kb_row8_ps0"; + nvidia,function = "kbc"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + nvidia,enable-input = <TEGRA_PIN_ENABLE>; + }; + + /* Thermal alert, need to be tristated */ + lcd_dc1_pd2 { + nvidia,pins = "lcd_dc1_pd2"; + nvidia,function = "rsvd3"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + nvidia,enable-input = <TEGRA_PIN_ENABLE>; + }; + + /* Colibri MMC */ + kb_row10_ps2 { + nvidia,pins = "kb_row10_ps2"; + nvidia,function = "sdmmc2"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + kb_row11_ps3 { + nvidia,pins = "kb_row11_ps3", + "kb_row12_ps4", + "kb_row13_ps5", + "kb_row14_ps6", + "kb_row15_ps7"; + nvidia,function = "sdmmc2"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_UP>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + + /* Colibri SSP */ + ulpi_clk_py0 { + nvidia,pins = "ulpi_clk_py0", + "ulpi_dir_py1", + "ulpi_nxt_py2", + "ulpi_stp_py3"; + nvidia,function = "spi1"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + sdmmc3_dat6_pd3 { + nvidia,pins = "sdmmc3_dat6_pd3", + "sdmmc3_dat7_pd4"; + nvidia,function = "spdif"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_ENABLE>; + }; + + /* Colibri UART_A */ + ulpi_data0 { + nvidia,pins = "ulpi_data0_po1", + "ulpi_data1_po2", + "ulpi_data2_po3", + "ulpi_data3_po4", + "ulpi_data4_po5", + "ulpi_data5_po6", + "ulpi_data6_po7", + "ulpi_data7_po0"; + nvidia,function = "uarta"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + + /* Colibri UART_B */ + gmi_a16_pj7 { + nvidia,pins = "gmi_a16_pj7", + "gmi_a17_pb0", + "gmi_a18_pb1", + "gmi_a19_pk7"; + nvidia,function = "uartd"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + + /* Colibri UART_C */ + uart2_rxd { + nvidia,pins = "uart2_rxd_pc3", + "uart2_txd_pc2"; + nvidia,function = "uartb"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + + /* eMMC */ + sdmmc4_clk_pcc4 { + nvidia,pins = "sdmmc4_clk_pcc4", + "sdmmc4_rst_n_pcc3"; + nvidia,function = "sdmmc4"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_NONE>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + sdmmc4_dat0_paa0 { + nvidia,pins = "sdmmc4_dat0_paa0", + "sdmmc4_dat1_paa1", + "sdmmc4_dat2_paa2", + "sdmmc4_dat3_paa3", + "sdmmc4_dat4_paa4", + "sdmmc4_dat5_paa5", + "sdmmc4_dat6_paa6", + "sdmmc4_dat7_paa7"; + nvidia,function = "sdmmc4"; + nvidia,pull = <TEGRA_PIN_PULL_UP>; + nvidia,tristate = <TEGRA_PIN_DISABLE>; + }; + }; + }; + + hdmiddc: i2c@7000c700 { + clock-frequency = <100000>; + }; + + /* + * PWR_I2C: power I2C to audio codec, PMIC, temperature sensor and + * touch screen controller + */ + i2c@7000d000 { + status = "okay"; + clock-frequency = <100000>; + + pmic: tps65911@2d { + compatible = "ti,tps65911"; + reg = <0x2d>; + + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 86 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + #interrupt-cells = <2>; + interrupt-controller; + + ti,system-power-controller; + + #gpio-cells = <2>; + gpio-controller; + + vcc1-supply = <&sys_3v3_reg>; + vcc2-supply = <&sys_3v3_reg>; + vcc3-supply = <&vio_reg>; + vcc4-supply = <&sys_3v3_reg>; + vcc5-supply = <&sys_3v3_reg>; + vcc6-supply = <&vio_reg>; + vcc7-supply = <&sys_5v0_reg>; + vccio-supply = <&sys_3v3_reg>; + + regulators { + /* SW1: +V1.35_VDDIO_DDR */ + vdd1_reg: vdd1 { + regulator-name = "vddio_ddr_1v35"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1350000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1350000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + /* SW2: unused */ + + /* SW CTRL: +V1.2_VDD_CPU */ + vddctrl_reg: vddctrl { + regulator-name = "vdd_cpu,vdd_sys"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + /* SWIO: +V1.8 */ + vio_reg: vio { + regulator-name = "vdd_1v8_gen"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + /* LDO1: unused */ + + /* + * EN_+V3.3 switching via FET: + * +V3.3_AUDIO_AVDD_S, +V3.3 and +V1.8_VDD_LAN + * see also v3_3 fixed supply + */ + ldo2_reg: ldo2 { + regulator-name = "en_3v3"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + /* LDO3: unused */ + + /* +V1.2_VDD_RTC */ + ldo4_reg: ldo4 { + regulator-name = "vdd_rtc"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + /* + * +V2.8_AVDD_VDAC: + * only required for analog RGB + */ + ldo5_reg: ldo5 { + regulator-name = "avdd_vdac"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <2800000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + /* + * +V1.05_AVDD_PLLE: avdd_plle should be 1.05V + * but LDO6 can't set voltage in 50mV + * granularity + */ + ldo6_reg: ldo6 { + regulator-name = "avdd_plle"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>; + }; + + /* +V1.2_AVDD_PLL */ + ldo7_reg: ldo7 { + regulator-name = "avdd_pll"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1200000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + + /* +V1.0_VDD_DDR_HS */ + ldo8_reg: ldo8 { + regulator-name = "vdd_ddr_hs"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <1000000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1000000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + }; + }; + + /* + * LM95245 temperature sensor + * Note: OVERT_N directly connected to PMIC PWRDN + */ + temp-sensor@4c { + compatible = "national,lm95245"; + reg = <0x4c>; + }; + + /* SW: +V1.2_VDD_CORE */ + tps62362@60 { + compatible = "ti,tps62362"; + reg = <0x60>; + + regulator-name = "tps62362-vout"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <1400000>; + regulator-boot-on; + regulator-always-on; + ti,vsel0-state-low; + /* VSEL1: EN_CORE_DVFS_N low for DVFS */ + ti,vsel1-state-low; + }; + }; + + pmc@7000e400 { + status = "okay"; + nvidia,invert-interrupt; + nvidia,suspend-mode = <1>; + nvidia,cpu-pwr-good-time = <5000>; + nvidia,cpu-pwr-off-time = <5000>; + nvidia,core-pwr-good-time = <3845 3845>; + nvidia,core-pwr-off-time = <0>; + nvidia,core-power-req-active-high; + nvidia,sys-clock-req-active-high; + }; + + emmc: sdhci@78000600 { + status = "okay"; + bus-width = <8>; + non-removable; + }; + + /* EHCI instance 1: USB2_DP/N -> AX88772B */ + usb@7d004000 { + status = "okay"; + }; + + usb-phy@7d004000 { + status = "okay"; + nvidia,is-wired = <1>; + }; + + clocks { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + clk32k_in: clk@0 { + compatible = "fixed-clock"; + reg=<0>; + #clock-cells = <0>; + clock-frequency = <32768>; + }; + }; + + regulators { + compatible = "simple-bus"; + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + + sys_3v3_reg: regulator@100 { + compatible = "regulator-fixed"; + reg = <100>; + regulator-name = "3v3"; + regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>; + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>; + regulator-always-on; + }; + }; +}; -- 1.9.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <d45ec5351ce8ef03256061bdc4b0ba673bd40c66.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 [not found] ` <d45ec5351ce8ef03256061bdc4b0ba673bd40c66.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-05-13 19:49 ` Stephen Warren [not found] ` <53727738.4080901-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2014-05-13 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y, thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, marcel-mitwqZ+T+m9Wk0Htik3J/w On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org wrote: > This patch adds the device tree to support Toradex Colibri T30, a > computer on module which can be used on different carrier boards. > > The module consists of a Tegra 30 SoC, two PMIC, DDR3L RAM, eMMC, > a LM95245 temperature sensor and an AX88772B USB Ethernet > Controller. Furthermore, there is a STMPE811 and SGTL5000 audio > codec which are not yet supported. Anything that is not self > contained on the module is disabled by default. > > The device tree for the Evaluation Board includes the modules > device tree and enables the supported pheripherials of the carrier > board (the Evaluation Board supports almost all of them). > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts > +#include "tegra30-colibri.dtsi" > + > +/ { > + model = "Toradex Colibri T30 on Colibri Evaluation Board"; > + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-eval-v3", "nvidia,tegra30"; That should include all the compatible values "inherited" from the Colibri T30 module .dtsi file too. > + aliases { > + rtc0 = "/i2c@7000c000/rtc@68"; > + rtc1 = "/i2c@7000d000/tps65911@2d"; > + rtc2 = "/rtc@7000e000"; > + }; Wow, no shortage of RTCs! > + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */ > + spi@7000d400 { > + status = "okay"; > + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>; > + can0: can@0 { > + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515"; > + reg = <0>; > + clocks = <&clk16m>; > + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; > + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; > + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>; So this chip doesn't get confused by a faster clock frequency when its chip-select line isn't asserted? I would have expected spi-max-frequency for the bus to be the minimum value that any device on the bus would tolerate. > + /* EHCI instance 0: USB1_DP/N -> USBC_P/N */ > + usb@7d000000 { > + status = "okay"; > + dr_mode = "otg"; The dr_mode property is only for the PHY node. > + panel: panel { > + compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel"; The panel-simple driver doesn't seem to know about that EDT panel. How will it work out the display timings? > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi > +/ { > + model = "Toradex Colibri T30"; > + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-v11b", > + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11c", > + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11d", > + "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30"; Do we really need all those compatible values? If those board revisions are all SW-compatible, then you may as well write just: compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30"; > + aliases { > + serial0 = &uarta; > + serial1 = &uartd; > + serial2 = &uartb; > + }; tegra20.dtsi already sets the alias names for the serial ports. Previous discussions settled on giving each on-chip UART a static name, rather than renaming them per board. > + pmc@7000e400 { > + status = "okay"; The PMC node isn't disabled in tegra20.dtsi, so you don't need the status property here. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <53727738.4080901-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 [not found] ` <53727738.4080901-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-05-14 7:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler 2014-05-14 14:32 ` Thierry Reding 2014-05-14 15:38 ` Stephen Warren 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Marcel Ziswiler @ 2014-05-14 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Warren, stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y, thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w Cc: linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA On 05/13/2014 09:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org wrote: >> This patch adds the device tree to support Toradex Colibri T30, a >> computer on module which can be used on different carrier boards. >> >> The module consists of a Tegra 30 SoC, two PMIC, DDR3L RAM, eMMC, >> a LM95245 temperature sensor and an AX88772B USB Ethernet >> Controller. Furthermore, there is a STMPE811 and SGTL5000 audio >> codec which are not yet supported. Anything that is not self >> contained on the module is disabled by default. >> >> The device tree for the Evaluation Board includes the modules >> device tree and enables the supported pheripherials of the carrier >> board (the Evaluation Board supports almost all of them). > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts > >> +#include "tegra30-colibri.dtsi" >> + >> +/ { >> + model = "Toradex Colibri T30 on Colibri Evaluation Board"; >> + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-eval-v3", "nvidia,tegra30"; > > That should include all the compatible values "inherited" from the > Colibri T30 module .dtsi file too. > >> + aliases { >> + rtc0 = "/i2c@7000c000/rtc@68"; >> + rtc1 = "/i2c@7000d000/tps65911@2d"; >> + rtc2 = "/rtc@7000e000"; >> + }; > > Wow, no shortage of RTCs! Yes (;-p). Please understand however that there are certain limitation if it comes to real-time clocks: The first one is the ultra low-power RTC available on the carrier board. The second one is PMIC integrated usually drawing much more current that the first dedicated one. The third one is Tegra SoC internal and won't keep the time across power-cycles in our design. >> + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */ >> + spi@7000d400 { >> + status = "okay"; >> + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>; >> + can0: can@0 { >> + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515"; >> + reg = <0>; >> + clocks = <&clk16m>; >> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; >> + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; >> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>; > > So this chip doesn't get confused by a faster clock frequency when its > chip-select line isn't asserted? I would have expected spi-max-frequency > for the bus to be the minimum value that any device on the bus would > tolerate. No SPI chip should ever get confused like that as long as they are chip select gated. At least by the traditional chip select meaning as opposed to NVIDIA's designers taking the term chip select a little too personal: they indeed only select a chip otherwise all the chip select pins are just left floating! >> + /* EHCI instance 0: USB1_DP/N -> USBC_P/N */ >> + usb@7d000000 { >> + status = "okay"; >> + dr_mode = "otg"; > > The dr_mode property is only for the PHY node. > >> + panel: panel { >> + compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel"; > > The panel-simple driver doesn't seem to know about that EDT panel. How > will it work out the display timings? Good question and me and Stefan actually even talked about that yesterday. I am actually using KMS right now as follows: video=HDMI-A-1:1280x720-16@60 video=LVDS-1:640x480-16@60' So the panel node is purely used to hook up the back light part right now. From our point of view for our completely generic module approach where each customer potentially hooks up his own display make/model it would be desirable to have some way of defining such timings directly through the device tree. >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri.dtsi > >> +/ { >> + model = "Toradex Colibri T30"; >> + compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30-v11b", >> + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11c", >> + "toradex,colibri_t30-v11d", >> + "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30"; > > Do we really need all those compatible values? If those board revisions > are all SW-compatible, then you may as well write just: You are right. It indeed does not make much sense as only V1.0a which never actually went on sale would be software incompatible. > compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30"; > >> + aliases { >> + serial0 = &uarta; >> + serial1 = &uartd; >> + serial2 = &uartb; >> + }; > > tegra20.dtsi already sets the alias names for the serial ports. Previous > discussions settled on giving each on-chip UART a static name, rather > than renaming them per board. Understood, however our Colibri standard defines a completely different order of the UARTs which is what we attempted to indicate by this aliases. >> + pmc@7000e400 { >> + status = "okay"; > > The PMC node isn't disabled in tegra20.dtsi, so you don't need the > status property here. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 2014-05-14 7:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler @ 2014-05-14 14:32 ` Thierry Reding 2014-05-14 15:38 ` Stephen Warren 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Thierry Reding @ 2014-05-14 14:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcel Ziswiler Cc: Stephen Warren, stefan, linux, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-tegra [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1190 bytes --] On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 09:22:54AM +0200, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > On 05/13/2014 09:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan@agner.ch wrote: [...] > >>+ panel: panel { > >>+ compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel"; > > > >The panel-simple driver doesn't seem to know about that EDT panel. How > >will it work out the display timings? > > Good question and me and Stefan actually even talked about that yesterday. I > am actually using KMS right now as follows: > > video=HDMI-A-1:1280x720-16@60 video=LVDS-1:640x480-16@60' > > So the panel node is purely used to hook up the back light part right now. > > From our point of view for our completely generic module approach where each > customer potentially hooks up his own display make/model it would be > desirable to have some way of defining such timings directly through the > device tree. Every customer design would presumably get its own device tree file, so they could easily follow the current conventions and update the panel-simple driver with the proper compatible value and display timings and then simply make the panel device node compatible with that. Thierry [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 2014-05-14 7:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler 2014-05-14 14:32 ` Thierry Reding @ 2014-05-14 15:38 ` Stephen Warren 1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2014-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marcel Ziswiler, stefan, thierry.reding, Laxman Dewangan Cc: linux, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-tegra On 05/14/2014 01:22 AM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote: > On 05/13/2014 09:49 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan@agner.ch wrote: >>> This patch adds the device tree to support Toradex Colibri T30, a >>> computer on module which can be used on different carrier boards. >>> >>> The module consists of a Tegra 30 SoC, two PMIC, DDR3L RAM, eMMC, >>> a LM95245 temperature sensor and an AX88772B USB Ethernet >>> Controller. Furthermore, there is a STMPE811 and SGTL5000 audio >>> codec which are not yet supported. Anything that is not self >>> contained on the module is disabled by default. >>> >>> The device tree for the Evaluation Board includes the modules >>> device tree and enables the supported pheripherials of the carrier >>> board (the Evaluation Board supports almost all of them). >> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-colibri-eval-v3.dts >>> + aliases { >>> + rtc0 = "/i2c@7000c000/rtc@68"; >>> + rtc1 = "/i2c@7000d000/tps65911@2d"; >>> + rtc2 = "/rtc@7000e000"; >>> + }; >> >> Wow, no shortage of RTCs! > > Yes (;-p). Please understand however that there are certain limitation > if it comes to real-time clocks: The first one is the ultra low-power > RTC available on the carrier board. The second one is PMIC integrated > usually drawing much more current that the first dedicated one. The > third one is Tegra SoC internal and won't keep the time across > power-cycles in our design. Sure, I understand this is just representing the HW. It was just surprising to see so many. >>> + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */ >>> + spi@7000d400 { >>> + status = "okay"; >>> + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>; >>> + can0: can@0 { >>> + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515"; >>> + reg = <0>; >>> + clocks = <&clk16m>; >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; >>> + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; >>> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>; >> >> So this chip doesn't get confused by a faster clock frequency when its >> chip-select line isn't asserted? I would have expected spi-max-frequency >> for the bus to be the minimum value that any device on the bus would >> tolerate. > > No SPI chip should ever get confused like that as long as they are chip > select gated. At least by the traditional chip select meaning as opposed > to NVIDIA's designers taking the term chip select a little too personal: > they indeed only select a chip otherwise all the chip select pins are > just left floating! I'm not convinced about this. The clock signal still reaches all the chips, and hence still reaches some logic inside those chips. If the setup/hold timings aren't met (for internal parts of the chip's SPI state machine), then presumably all bets are off re: performance of the chip, irrespective of whether the CS line happens to gate how much of the chip actually does anything. >> The dr_mode property is only for the PHY node. >> >>> + panel: panel { >>> + compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel"; >> >> The panel-simple driver doesn't seem to know about that EDT panel. How >> will it work out the display timings? > > Good question and me and Stefan actually even talked about that > yesterday. I am actually using KMS right now as follows: > > video=HDMI-A-1:1280x720-16@60 video=LVDS-1:640x480-16@60' > > So the panel node is purely used to hook up the back light part right now. > > From our point of view for our completely generic module approach where > each customer potentially hooks up his own display make/model it would > be desirable to have some way of defining such timings directly through > the device tree. Like Thierry, I think the DT needs to represent the actual HW. If there's no panel on the carrier board itself, then it probably shouldn't even be in the base DT. If a user adds a panel, then they will modify their own DT to correctly represent it. >> compatible = "toradex,colibri_t30", "nvidia,tegra30"; >> >>> + aliases { >>> + serial0 = &uarta; >>> + serial1 = &uartd; >>> + serial2 = &uartb; >>> + }; >> >> tegra20.dtsi already sets the alias names for the serial ports. Previous >> discussions settled on giving each on-chip UART a static name, rather >> than renaming them per board. > > Understood, however our Colibri standard defines a completely different > order of the UARTs which is what we attempted to indicate by this aliases. I'd prefer that all Tegra boards use serial aliases consistently. If there's a real issue with this, please talk to Laxman (CC'd) and see if we can move all the UART alias entries into individual board files, so that this board isn't the odd one out. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 @ 2014-05-14 16:16 Stefan Agner [not found] ` <107aeb48982529858267cb85c792b35e-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Stefan Agner @ 2014-05-14 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Warren Cc: thierry.reding, linux, devicetree, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-tegra, marcel Am 2014-05-13 21:49, schrieb Stephen Warren: > On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan@agner.ch wrote: >> + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */ >> + spi@7000d400 { >> + status = "okay"; >> + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>; >> + can0: can@0 { >> + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515"; >> + reg = <0>; >> + clocks = <&clk16m>; >> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; >> + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; >> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>; > > So this chip doesn't get confused by a faster clock frequency when its > chip-select line isn't asserted? I would have expected spi-max-frequency > for the bus to be the minimum value that any device on the bus would > tolerate. And from the other mail: > I'm not convinced about this. The clock signal still reaches all the > chips, and hence still reaches some logic inside those chips. If the > setup/hold timings aren't met (for internal parts of the chip's SPI > state machine), then presumably all bets are off re: performance of the > chip, irrespective of whether the CS line happens to gate how much of > the chip actually does anything. SPI is by default not a multi-master Bus, hence the slaves only have to listen when the CS is asserted. I talked with our hardware expert, and he told me that he would expect that the whole input stage (input driver) is in reset/off logic when the CS line is not asserted. IMHO, this makes sense, this would also save power. At least he would expect that the communication state machine is resetted on CS assertion, so that it doesn't matter what happend before. Wikipedia also states something similar. But, since SPI is no real standard, devices which work differently and claim to communicate through SPI could exist :-) I have had not seen issues with this device when using faster clocks for other devices on the same bus. >> + panel: panel { >> + compatible = "edt,et057090dhu", "simple-panel"; > > The panel-simple driver doesn't seem to know about that EDT panel. How > will it work out the display timings? I will send a patch adding our two default panels. Will send a second revision soon. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <107aeb48982529858267cb85c792b35e-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 [not found] ` <107aeb48982529858267cb85c792b35e-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> @ 2014-05-15 18:13 ` Stephen Warren 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Stephen Warren @ 2014-05-15 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stefan Agner Cc: thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, marcel-mitwqZ+T+m9Wk0Htik3J/w On 05/14/2014 10:16 AM, Stefan Agner wrote: > Am 2014-05-13 21:49, schrieb Stephen Warren: >> On 05/13/2014 11:27 AM, stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org wrote: >>> + /* SPI1: Colibri SSP */ >>> + spi@7000d400 { >>> + status = "okay"; >>> + spi-max-frequency = <25000000>; >>> + can0: can@0 { >>> + compatible = "microchip,mcp2515"; >>> + reg = <0>; >>> + clocks = <&clk16m>; >>> + interrupt-parent = <&gpio>; >>> + interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(S, 0) GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW>; >>> + spi-max-frequency = <10000000>; >> >> So this chip doesn't get confused by a faster clock frequency when its >> chip-select line isn't asserted? I would have expected spi-max-frequency >> for the bus to be the minimum value that any device on the bus would >> tolerate. > > And from the other mail: >> I'm not convinced about this. The clock signal still reaches all the >> chips, and hence still reaches some logic inside those chips. If the >> setup/hold timings aren't met (for internal parts of the chip's SPI >> state machine), then presumably all bets are off re: performance of the >> chip, irrespective of whether the CS line happens to gate how much of >> the chip actually does anything. > > SPI is by default not a multi-master Bus, hence the slaves only have to > listen when the CS is asserted. That's got nothing to do with multi-master; it's got to do with the fact that an out-of-band /CS signal is what selects devices rather than in-band data on the bus. > I talked with our hardware expert, and > he told me that he would expect that the whole input stage (input > driver) is in reset/off logic when the CS line is not asserted. IMHO, > this makes sense, this would also save power. At least he would expect > that the communication state machine is resetted on CS assertion, so > that it doesn't matter what happend before. > > Wikipedia also states something similar. I find it much more likely that /CS would be a synchronous input to the SPI state machine in the HW. That way, the chip designers don't have to worry about issues with asynchronous resets. Anyway, both our arguments are pure conjecture. The only way to tell for sure is for you to go read the datasheets for the individual devices and find out if they document any requirements for the clock signal when /CS isn't active. It'd be good if you could check that. > But, since SPI is no real standard, devices which work differently and > claim to communicate through SPI could exist :-) > > I have had not seen issues with this device when using faster clocks for > other devices on the same bus. ... but I suppose that since in practice you're not seeing any issues, the DT is fine for now. It's not like this can't be changed later if we find out there is an issue. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-05-15 18:13 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-05-13 17:27 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: tegra: initial support for Colibri T30 stefan 2014-05-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: tegra: enable MCP251x CAN controller and DS1307 RTC stefan [not found] ` <77cfca0a1769d867c8d2919f0040fbd785940fef.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> 2014-05-13 19:57 ` Stephen Warren 2014-05-13 17:27 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: tegra: initial add of Colibri T30 stefan [not found] ` <d45ec5351ce8ef03256061bdc4b0ba673bd40c66.1400001937.git.stefan-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> 2014-05-13 19:49 ` Stephen Warren [not found] ` <53727738.4080901-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org> 2014-05-14 7:22 ` Marcel Ziswiler 2014-05-14 14:32 ` Thierry Reding 2014-05-14 15:38 ` Stephen Warren -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2014-05-14 16:16 Stefan Agner [not found] ` <107aeb48982529858267cb85c792b35e-XLVq0VzYD2Y@public.gmane.org> 2014-05-15 18:13 ` Stephen Warren
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).