From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: exynos5420: Add 5800 specific clocks Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 22:46:00 +0200 Message-ID: <5373D608.5020404@gmail.com> References: <1399638303-32600-1-git-send-email-arun.kk@samsung.com> <1399638303-32600-2-git-send-email-arun.kk@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1399638303-32600-2-git-send-email-arun.kk@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Arun Kumar K , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, dianders@chromium.org, alim.akhtar@samsung.com, olof@lixom.net, arunkk.samsung@gmail.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Arun, Alim, On 09.05.2014 14:25, Arun Kumar K wrote: > From: Alim Akhtar > > Exynos5800 clock structure is mostly similar to 5420 with only > a small delta changes. So the 5420 clock file is re-used for > 5800 also. The common clocks for both are seggreagated and few > clocks which are different for both are separately initialized. > > Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar > Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K > --- > Changes from v1 > --------------- > - Rebased on clock cleanup by Shaik This still isn't using correct base and won't compile with current sources, even if it applies fine. This is partially my fault as we had a lot of issues with cross-tree dependencies and it was not clear what to base clock patches on, but I'll try to keep samsung-clk-next branch of samsung-clk [1] tree up to date, so it should be safe to base on. [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tfiga/samsung-clk.git Best regards, Tomasz