From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: EXYNOS: Add generic cpu power control functions for all exynos based SoCs Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 02:32:57 +0200 Message-ID: <5376AE39.1030301@gmail.com> References: <1399307221-8659-1-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> <1399307221-8659-2-git-send-email-a.kesavan@samsung.com> <019b01cf6e52$75e1a710$61a4f530$@samsung.com> <53752D8C.3030708@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Abhilash Kesavan Cc: Kukjin Kim , Nicolas Pitre , "mark.rutland" , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Arnd Bergmann , devicetree , Andrew Bresticker , Tomasz Figa , Daniel Lezcano , Will Deacon , skon.hwang@samsung.com, robh+dt , linux-samsung-soc , Thomas P Abraham , Grant Likely , Jonghwan Choi , Dave Martin , linux-arm-kernel , "inderpal.s@samsung.com" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 16.05.2014 07:07, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: > Hi Tomasz, > > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:41 AM, Tomasz Figa wrote: >> Hi Abhilash, >> >> On 13.05.2014 12:12, Abhilash Kesavan wrote: >>> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: >> >> [snip] >> >>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs- >>>>> pmu.h >>>>> index 4f6a256..0bdfcbc 100644 >>>>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/regs-pmu.h >>>>> @@ -121,6 +121,12 @@ >>>>> >>>>> #define S5P_CHECK_SLEEP 0x00000BAD >>>>> >>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION S5P_PMUREG(0x2000) >>>> >>>> This can be put in order of address. >>> OK, will fix. >>>> >>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) \ >>>>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE0_CONFIGURATION + (0x80 * (_nr))) >>>>> +#define EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_STATUS(_nr) \ >>>>> + (EXYNOS_ARM_CORE_CONFIGURATION(_nr) + 0x4) >> >> My patches posted quite a while ago [1] to fix DT CPU topology already >> add these, remove S5P_ARM_CORE1* and fix corresponding usage in >> hotplug.c and platsmp.c. >> >> [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/29573 >> >> So I think you should rebase on top of them or at least on top of >> patches 1 and 2 from that series, as 3 and 4 should be dropped. > > Patch 2 of your series does not apply on kgene's for-next or > linux-next. Are you planning on re-sending this ? OK, it seems like Kukjin has already applied your v6 series, so let's drop my series for now. I'll remove patch 1 from my series and rebase it on top of your v6. Best regards, Tomasz