From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] ks8851 DT updates Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 12:34:01 -0700 Message-ID: <537FA2A9.6050309@codeaurora.org> References: <1400792413-21618-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> <20140523.151502.1106354754894891974.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140523.151502.1106354754894891974.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, nm@ti.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 05/23/14 12:15, David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Boyd > Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 14:00:08 -0700 > >> This set of patches properly documents the micrel ks8851 spi ethernet >> controller, converts to devm_regulator_get_optional() to make error >> paths slightly simpler, and finally adds supports for another >> optional regulator and a reset gpio. > Please do not submit patch sets that you expect different trees to > integrate, this is painful for maintainers to deal with. > > Instead, submit the changes separately. One series for one > maintainer's tree, another for the other maintainer's tree. > Ok. Shall I resend this series with the proper separation? Or can you ignore the first patch? There isn't any functional dependency, more just a checkpatch dependency which is not really all that important. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation