From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Thompson Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: serial: msm_serial.c: Cleaning up uninitialized variables Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:15:28 +0100 Message-ID: <538C4EC0.6090300@linaro.org> References: <1401629904-19492-1-git-send-email-rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1401629904-19492-1-git-send-email-rickard_strandqvist@spectrumdigital.se> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rickard Strandqvist , David Brown , Daniel Walker Cc: Bryan Huntsman , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Jiri Slaby , Grant Likely , Rob Herring , linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 01/06/14 14:38, Rickard Strandqvist wrote: > There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized. > > This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck. > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist > --- > drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c > index 053b98e..c67f5c5 100644 > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c > @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static int __init msm_console_setup(struct console *co, char *options) > { > struct uart_port *port; > struct msm_port *msm_port; > - int baud, flow, bits, parity; > + int baud = 0, flow, bits, parity; This made me wonder my "baud" is special compared to the other three variables. In fact I don't really think it is special so setting "baud" from the else clause in the uninitialized branch makes more sense to me.