From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Khiem Nguyen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] ARM: shmobile: koelsch reference: Enable DMA for QSPI Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2014 09:18:27 +0900 Message-ID: <538E65D3.7080909@renesas.com> References: <1401716531-29794-1-git-send-email-geert+renesas@glider.be> <538D50D1.7010900@renesas.com> <20140603232906.GC19407@verge.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140603232906.GC19407@verge.net.au> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Simon Horman , Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: khiem.nguyen.xt@renesas.com, Geert Uytterhoeven , Magnus Damm , Ben Dooks , Laurent Pinchart , Linux-sh list , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Geert, Simon, On 6/4/2014 8:29 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 09:05:42AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Khiem Nguyen >> wrote: >>> I think this patch series should be divided into 2 parts, >>> one for DMA in general and one for DMA supporting QSPI. >>> >>> How do you think about it ? >> I don't think it's worth splitting off just the last patch into a separate >> series. >> >> This is a series, not a single patch. The applyer can always drop some >> patches. > FWIW, that seems reasonable to me. Thanks for your explanation. I got it. Sorry for the noise. Best regards, KHIEM Nguyen