From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 05/14] clk: Add generic driver for Maxim PMIC clocks Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 14:31:36 +0200 Message-ID: <53AC12A8.6040201@collabora.co.uk> References: <1403723019-6212-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1403723019-6212-6-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Yadwinder Singh Brar Cc: Lee Jones , Samuel Ortiz , Mark Brown , Mike Turquette , Liam Girdwood , Alessandro Zummo , Kukjin Kim , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Sjoerd Simons , Daniel Stone , Tomeu Vizoso , Krzysztof Kozlowski , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , devicetree , linux-samsung-soc , linux-kernel List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hello Yadwinder, Thanks a lot for your feedback. On 06/26/2014 01:51 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote: > Hi Javier, > > Sorry for jumping in late, but just one concern mentioned inline. > > [ .. ] > >> + >> +static unsigned long max_gen_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, >> + unsigned long parent_rate) >> +{ >> + return 32768; >> +} > > Isn't more safer(correct), if it check and return 0 when clk is > disabled(unprepared) ? > Makes sense to me. I'll add a if (__clk_is_enabled(hw->clk)) check in the next version. > Regards, > Yadwinder > Best regards, Javier