From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Warren Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 4/9] pinctrl: tegra-xusb: Add USB PHY support Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:08:57 -0600 Message-ID: <53AC61B9.5030408@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1403072180-4944-1-git-send-email-abrestic@chromium.org> <1403072180-4944-5-git-send-email-abrestic@chromium.org> <53AB493F.3030802@wwwdotorg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andrew Bresticker Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, "linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Randy Dunlap , Thierry Reding , Russell King , Linus Walleij , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Mathias Nyman , Grant Likely , Alan Stern , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Arnd Bergmann , bal List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 06/25/2014 05:30 PM, Andrew Bresticker wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 06/18/2014 12:16 AM, Andrew Bresticker wrote: >>> In addition to the PCIe and SATA PHYs, the XUSB pad controller also >>> supports 3 UTMI, 2 HSIC, and 2 USB3 PHYs. Each USB3 PHY uses a single >>> PCIe or SATA lane and is mapped to one of the three UTMI ports. >>> >> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra-xusb.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-tegra-xusb.c >> >>> @@ -372,6 +720,193 @@ static int tegra_xusb_padctl_pinconf_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pinctrl, >>> padctl_writel(padctl, regval, lane->offset); >>> break; >>> >>> + case TEGRA_XUSB_PADCTL_USB3_PORT_NUM: >>> + if (value >= TEGRA_XUSB_PADCTL_USB3_PORTS) { >>> + dev_err(padctl->dev, "Invalid USB3 port: %lu\n", >>> + value); >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + } >>> + if (!is_pcie_sata_lane(group)) { >>> + dev_err(padctl->dev, >>> + "USB3 port not applicable for pin %d\n", >>> + group); >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + } >>> + padctl->usb3_ports[value].lane = group; >>> + break; >> >> It feels odd to use pinctrl for a SW-only purpose. In other words, that >> chunk of code isn't writing the pinconf data to HW, but rather some >> internal variable. > > Well the mapping of lanes to USB3 ports is a hardware property and we > do use it when programming the hardware later to choose which set of > lane registers to program given a USB3 port, but it's true that it's > not some value we program into HW directly. > >> Perhaps it would make more sense for the DT binding to represent this >> data directly in a custom property that's parsed at probe() time. That >> way, pinctrl only touches "real" HW stuff. > > I'm on the fence about this. If you or others feel strongly about > this then I can make it a separate DT property and move it out of the > pinctrl properties. I'd certainly prefer to use pinctrl bindings only for things that get directly written into HW. Other configuration data should be easy to retrieve directly from properties.