From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/4] pinctrl: Update Qualcomm pm8xxx GPIO parameters definitions Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 14:46:45 -0700 Message-ID: <53D02D45.50000@codeaurora.org> References: <1405610748-7583-5-git-send-email-iivanov@mm-sol.com> <1405626085-14069-1-git-send-email-iivanov@mm-sol.com> <20140722214643.GH19700@sonymobile.com> <1406119669.28520.10.camel@iivanov-dev> <1406131556.2585.42.camel@iivanov-dev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1406131556.2585.42.camel@iivanov-dev> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Ivan T. Ivanov" Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Linus Walleij , Mark Brown , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/23/14 09:05, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote: > >> both on >>> pm8xxx and qpnp-pin there are two different HW blocks, one for GPIO and one for >>> MPP. And if you look in your pinconf_set function you will see that they are >>> very different. > I bet that the hardware blocks are almost identical, just register > map is different. The hardware is different and not "almost identical". If it was the same then we would have called them all GPIOs or MPPs and not had a distinction. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation