From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [RFC 5/5] ARM: dts: Improve Peach Pit and Pi power scheme model Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 10:53:24 +0200 Message-ID: <53D8B284.8040002@collabora.co.uk> References: <1406651339-28901-1-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <1406651339-28901-6-git-send-email-javier.martinez@collabora.co.uk> <20140729172005.GW17528@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140729172005.GW17528@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: Kukjin Kim , Doug Anderson , Olof Johansson , Yuvaraj Kumar C D , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/29/2014 07:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 06:28:59PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> The DeviceTree files for the Peach Pit and Pi machines have >> a simplistic model of the connections between the different >> regulators since not all the tps65090 regulators get their >> input supply voltage from the VDC. DCDC1-3, LD0-1 and fet7 >> parent supply is indded VDC but the fet1-6 get their input >> supply from the DCDC1 and DCDC2 output voltage rails. > > Acked-by: Mark Brown > Thanks. > This *should* be independent of the rest of this series. > Yes, it is independent as I explained in the cover letter. I just added in the series since it was an RFC and I wanted you to have the complete picture. I'll post it as an separate patch with your ack, sorry if this may cause an inconvenience to you. Best regards, Javier