From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Figa Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: dts: Add exynos5250-spring device tree Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 23:09:58 +0200 Message-ID: <53DAB0A6.9030700@gmail.com> References: <1406822910-6255-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1406822910-6255-5-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <53DA936E.9060004@gmail.com> <53DAA8E6.3010400@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <53DAA8E6.3010400@suse.de> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Stephan van Schaik , Vincent Palatin , Doug Anderson , Javier Martinez Canillas , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Russell King , Ben Dooks , Kukjin Kim , open list List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 31.07.2014 22:36, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > Am 31.07.2014 21:05, schrieb Tomasz Figa: >>> + }; >>> + >>> + fixed-rate-clocks { >>> + xxti { >>> + compatible =3D "samsung,clock-xxti"; >>> + clock-frequency =3D <24000000>; >>> + }; >>> + }; >> >> This is also referencing a node from higher level, so it should be d= one >> using a reference. >=20 > Actually this one isn't! Neither fixed-rate-clocks nor xxti exists in > the .dtsi. You've got me here. :) In new dts I actually suggest to specify those on SoC level, since they are generic SoC inputs and just override their frequencies on board level, but apparently Exynos5250 doesn't follow this fashion. So this i= s fine as is, sorry for noise. Best regards, Tomasz