From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jaehoon Chung Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 1/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Slot quirk "disable-wp" is deprecated. Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2014 13:26:43 +0900 Message-ID: <53DB1703.4090002@samsung.com> References: <1406784907-26349-1-git-send-email-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <1406784907-26349-2-git-send-email-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <53DA8CCB.3080900@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-reply-to: <53DA8CCB.3080900@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kukjin Kim , Doug Anderson Cc: linux-mmc , Chris Ball , Ulf Hansson , Seungwon Jeon , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , =?UTF-8?B?SGVpa28gU3TDvGJuZXI=?= , Dinh Nguyen , Mark Rutland , linux-samsung-soc , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , cpgs List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, All. It seems too late that this patch-set is merged into linux-3.16. Also there are some conflicts in device-tree. (I will remove the conflicts) So if everybody is ok, I will rebase on linux-next after released linux-3.16. At that time, i will send this patch-set to stable kernel, too. how about? And I want to know who can apply this patch-set(#3~#5). Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung On 08/01/2014 03:36 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 08/01/14 01:02, Doug Anderson wrote: >> Jaehoon >> >> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:35 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >>> Slot quirks "disable-wp" is deprecated. >>> Instead, use the host quirk "disable-wp". >>> (Because the slot-node is removed in dt-file.) >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung >>> Tested-by: Sachin Kamat >>> Acked-by: Seungwon Jeon >>> --- >>> drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc.c | 11 +++++++++-- >>> include/linux/mmc/dw_mmc.h | 2 ++ >>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> Thanks for taking my suggestion and making it backward compatible. >> This looks great to me. It tested this in both the backward >> compatible way (with the warning) and the non-backward compatible way. >> I think we should land and patch #2 ASAP and then we can land the rest >> of the series as SoC maintainers see fit. >> > Yes, right if we don't want to see useless merge conflicts... > > When I sent ack on exynos stuff, there was no conflict with my tree but happens it now. > > - Kukjin > > >> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson >> Tested-by: Doug Anderson >