From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org,
Ian Campbell
<ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org>,
linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: davinci: add support for adding delay between word's transmission
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2014 14:20:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <540F44EB.8090700@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140909172057.GH2601-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
On 09/09/2014 01:20 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 01:09:27PM -0400, Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 09/09/2014 12:55 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 07:07:31PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>>>> - ti,spi-c2t-delay: Chip-select-active-to-transmit-start delay
>>>> (SPIDELAY.C2TDELAY)
>
>>>> - ti,spi-t2c-delay: Transmit-end-to-chip-select-inactive delay
>>>> (SPIDELAY.T2CDELAY)
>
>>> Now I look at these they look very much like the standard delay feature
>>> that the SPI subsystem has already - are they?
>
>> As Grygorii explained in previous postings (reproduced below), these delays
>> are handled by the SPI hardware on Keystone and affect the delay between
>> successive word tranmssion and has nothing to do with the delay you are
>> talking about. Isn't the standard delay you mention here is between
>> successive packets send down to the lower level driver (in this case
>> spi-davinci.c) ?
>
> He talked about such delays between words (and there were some other
> delays listed which seemed to meet that description) but the above don't
> appear to refer to them, the above refer to delays around chip select
> which most definitely are covered with the standard delays.
>
> If these delays are not related to chip select then the documentation
> needs to be fixed to not refer to chip select.
Ok. So what I understand is the issue is not having the right
description to indicate that these parameters are delays associated with
tranmission of successive words on the wire. Personally I like these
description match with what is described in the device spec/ user guide
and what is described above match with that. However we could add
additional description as below to to make it more explicit.
spi-c2t-delay - delay after CS is asserted before output bits on wire
spi-t2c-delay - delay after tramission of bits and before deasserting CS
wdelay - delay between successive word transmission.
Do you think this will help?
Murali
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-09 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-09 16:07 [PATCH v2] spi: davinci: add support for adding delay between word's transmission Grygorii Strashko
[not found] ` <1410278851-10783-1-git-send-email-grygorii.strashko-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-09 16:55 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20140909165555.GD2601-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-09 17:09 ` Murali Karicheri
[not found] ` <540F3447.3020609-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-09 17:20 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20140909172057.GH2601-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-09 18:20 ` Murali Karicheri [this message]
[not found] ` <540F44EB.8090700-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-09 19:58 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-10 17:02 ` Grygorii Strashko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=540F44EB.8090700@ti.com \
--to=m-karicheri2-l0cymroini0@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).