From: Christopher Covington <cov@codeaurora.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: olof@lixom.net, mark.rutland@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
pawel.moll@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
galak@codeaurora.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Nathan Lynch <Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify the physical timer
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 11:58:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5411C68B.6090308@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1410450727-8182-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
Hi Doug,
On 09/11/2014 11:52 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Some 32-bit (ARMv7) systems are architected like this:
>
> * The firmware doesn't know and doesn't care about hypervisor mode and
> we don't want to add the complexity of hypervisor there.
>
> * The firmware isn't involved in SMP bringup or resume.
>
> * The ARCH timer come up with an uninitialized offset between the
> virtual and physical counters. Each core gets a different random
> offset.
>
> On systems like the above, it doesn't make sense to use the virtual
> counter. There's nobody managing the offset and each time a core goes
> down and comes back up it will get reinitialized to some other random
> value.
>
> Let's add a property to the device tree to say that we shouldn't use
> the virtual timer. Firmware could potentially remove this property
> before passing the device tree to the kernel if it really wants the
> kernel to use a virtual timer.
>
> Note that it's been said that ARM64 (ARMv8) systems the firmware and
> kernel really can't be architected as described above. That means
> using the physical timer like this really only makes sense for ARMv7
> systems.
>
> In order for this patch to do anything useful, we also need Sonny's
> patch at <https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4790921/>
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@chromium.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt | 6 ++++++
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
> index 37b2caf..876d32b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt
> @@ -22,6 +22,12 @@ to deliver its interrupts via SPIs.
> - always-on : a boolean property. If present, the timer is powered through an
> always-on power domain, therefore it never loses context.
>
> +** Optional properties:
> +
> +- arm,use-physical-timer : Don't ever use the virtual timer, just use the
> + physical one. Not supported for ARM64.
> +
> +
> Example:
>
> timer {
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> index 5163ec1..8ca07a9 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c
> @@ -649,6 +649,9 @@ static void __init arch_timer_init(struct device_node *np)
> arch_timer_ppi[i] = irq_of_parse_and_map(np, i);
> arch_timer_detect_rate(NULL, np);
>
> + if (of_property_read_bool(np, "arm,use-physical-timer"))
> + arch_timer_use_virtual = false;
> +
> /*
> * If HYP mode is available, we know that the physical timer
> * has been configured to be accessible from PL1. Use it, so
>
How's the VDSO supposed to deal with this? It currently does:
cycle_now = arch_counter_get_cntvct()
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-11 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-11 15:52 [PATCH] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify the physical timer Doug Anderson
2014-09-11 15:58 ` Christopher Covington [this message]
2014-09-11 16:04 ` Doug Anderson
2014-09-11 16:09 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-11 16:20 ` Christopher Covington
2014-09-11 16:07 ` Nathan Lynch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5411C68B.6090308@codeaurora.org \
--to=cov@codeaurora.org \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=Nathan_Lynch@mentor.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sonnyrao@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).