From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: a case for a common efuse API? Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:59:08 -0700 Message-ID: <54121B2C.5090702@codeaurora.org> References: <53BC4DD7.20906@codeaurora.org> <20140709083509.GQ13423@lukather> <53BDD0F3.7040906@codeaurora.org> <20140710142616.GD27469@lukather> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20140710142616.GD27469@lukather> Sender: linux-arm-msm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Maxime Ripard Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Bjorn Andersson , Stephen Warren , Peter De Schrijver , Arnd Bergmann , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 07/10/14 07:26, Maxime Ripard wrote: > > I guess that the kind of things we could discuss after posting these > patches, but yep, it looks reasonnable. > > I'll try to get things a bit cleaner, and post them in the next days. > I never saw anything. Did you do any cleaning/posting? I'm going to try it out today/tomorrow to see if it can make some things cleaner. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation