From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Boyd Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource: arch_timer: Allow the device tree to specify the physical timer Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:59:29 -0700 Message-ID: <54134291.3040700@codeaurora.org> References: <1410452204-7277-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org> <20140911164710.GW6158@arm.com> <5411D528.4050605@arm.com> <5411DA67.2040402@arm.com> <5411DF5D.8060906@arm.com> <5412DC48.7030708@codeaurora.org> <5412E3BB.9030800@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5412E3BB.9030800-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Marc Zyngier , Christopher Covington Cc: Doug Anderson , Will Deacon , "olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org" , Sonny Rao , Catalin Marinas , Mark Rutland , Sudeep Holla , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Thomas Gleixner , Daniel Lezcano , Nathan Lynch , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org" , Pawel Moll , "ijc+devicetree-KcIKpvwj1kUDXYZnReoRVg@public.gmane.org" , "galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org" , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 09/12/14 05:14, Marc Zyngier wrote: > Hi Christopher, > > On 12/09/14 12:43, Christopher Covington wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> On 09/11/2014 01:43 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> On 11/09/14 18:29, Doug Anderson wrote: >>> >>>> I did this in the past (again, see Sonny's thread), but didn't >>>> consider myself knowledgeable to know if that was truly a good test: >>>> >>>> asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c1, 0" : "=r" (val)); >>>> pr_info("DOUG: val is %#010x", val); >>>> val |= (1 << 2); >>>> asm volatile("mcr p15, 0, %0, c1, c1, 0" : : "r" (val)); >>>> val = 0xffffffff; >>>> asm volatile("mrc p15, 0, %0, c1, c1, 0" : "=r" (val)); >>>> pr_info("DOUG: val is %#010x", val); >>>> >>>> The idea being that if you can make modifications to the SCR register >>>> (and see your changes take effect) then you must be in secure mode. >>>> In my case the first printout was 0x0 and the second was 0x4. >>> The main issue is when you're *not* in secure mode. It is likely that >>> this will explode badly. This is why I suggested something that is set >>> by the bootloader (after all. it knows which mode it is booted in), and >>> that the timer driver can use when the CPU comes up. >> What exactly does "exploding badly" look like? Causing and undefined >> instruction exception? That's just a branch with a mode switch. Any reason the >> code couldn't deal with that or even use that to its advantage? > We surely can handle the UNDEF and do something there. We just can't do > it the way Doug described it above. > > I suggested doing that for something else a while ago and Will and Dave we're not thrilled[1]. The suggestion back then was to use DT to indicate what mode the kernel is running in. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-June/105321.html -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html