From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gregory CLEMENT Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add Allwinner A80 dtsi Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 14:36:12 +0200 Message-ID: <5422BABC.7020906@free-electrons.com> References: <1411311493-24344-1-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <1411311493-24344-4-git-send-email-wens@csie.org> <20140924063738.GQ15315@lukather> <54227038.2020805@free-electrons.com> Reply-To: linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Maxime Ripard , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree , linux-kernel , Shuge , Meng Zhang , yhf , ctl , linux-sunxi List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Chen-Yu, >=20 > Thanks for the tip. Before I send v2, I do have a question. I'm using >=20 > ranges =3D <0 0 0 0x20000000>; >=20 > in the clocks and soc node to avoid having to use 64bit values for all > addresses and sizes. Would this be undesirable, even bad practice maybe? We did something like that for all the internal registers too as they are a= ll under 4GB. In our case the use of a range really makes sens because the har= dware addresses were configurable. You don't have such requirement so I can't say= if it is a bad practice. From my point of view it seems sensible but I am not = an DT expert. Gr=C3=A9gory --=20 Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com --=20 You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "= linux-sunxi" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an e= mail to linux-sunxi+unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.