From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: sunxi: Fix interrupt-cells for [r]pio on A23/A31/A33/A80 Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:38:36 +0200 Message-ID: <5423411.WHZ4SNGvxb@wuerfel> References: <1444919327-23747-1-git-send-email-hdegoede@redhat.com> Reply-To: arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1444919327-23747-1-git-send-email-hdegoede-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , To: Hans de Goede Cc: Linus Walleij , Maxime Ripard , Chen-Yu Tsai , Thomas Kaiser , devicetree , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-sunxi-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 15 October 2015 16:28:45 Hans de Goede wrote: > When the gpio interrupt bindings where changed to add a bank to the > specifier list, the r_pio nodes of A23/A31/A33 where not updated to > match and neither was the pio node of the A80, this fixes this. > > Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede > Is this safe to apply by itself? I don't see any interrupts references to these nodes, so I assume it's fine, but if there are any cross-dependencies we need more careful planning. Arnd