From: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav-edOiRQu9Xnj5XLMNweQjbQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Archit Taneja <architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>,
vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Generalize BAM register offset calculations
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 13:52:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542BB9C7.2000600@smartplayin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140929221406.GE11142-zC7DfRvBq/JWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
On Tuesday 30 September 2014 03:44 AM, Andy Gross wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:03:07AM +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
>> The BAM DMA IP comes in different versions. The register offset layout varies
>> among these versions. The layouts depend on which generation/family of SoCs they
>> belong to.
>>
>> The current SoCs(like 8084, 8074) have a layout where the Top level registers
>> come in the beginning of the address range, followed by pipe and event
>> registers. The BAM revision numbers fall above 1.4.0.
>>
>> The older SoCs (like 8064, 8960) have a layout where the pipe registers come
>> first, and the top level come later. These have BAM revision numbers lesser than
>> 1.4.0.
>>
>> It isn't suitable to have macros provide the register offsets with the layouts
>> changed. Future BAM revisions may have different register layouts too. The
>> register addresses are now calculated by referring a table which contains a base
>> offset and multipliers for pipe/evnt/ee registers.
>>
>> We have a common function bam_addr() which computes addresses for all the
>> registers. When computing address of top level/ee registers, we pass 0 to the
>> pipe argument in addr() since they don't have any multiple instances.
>>
>> Some of the unused register definitions are removed. We can add new registers as
>> we need them.
>
> Vinod,
>
> These changes replace the patch set I had that implemented support for the
> v.1.3.0 register set.
Andy,
With your change "dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add v1.3.0 driver support"
and enabling qcom_bam_dma driver i was seeing some crashes in the kernel
on IFC6410. But after reverting you change and applying these changes
from Vinod I see IFC6410 booting fine.
Here are the crash logs in case it helps and if your changes are still
planned by you for upstream.
http://paste.ubuntu.com/8471405/
Thanks
Pramod
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-01 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1411037575-13153-1-git-send-email-architt@codeaurora.org>
2014-09-18 10:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] dt/bindings: dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add compatible string for BAM v1.3.0 Archit Taneja
2014-09-19 19:00 ` Kumar Gala
2014-09-22 4:56 ` Andy Gross
2014-09-29 4:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Generalize BAM register offset calculations Archit Taneja
2014-09-29 4:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] dt/bindings: dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add compatible string for BAM v1.3.0 Archit Taneja
2014-09-29 22:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Generalize BAM register offset calculations Andy Gross
[not found] ` <20140929221406.GE11142-zC7DfRvBq/JWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2014-10-01 8:22 ` Pramod Gurav [this message]
2014-10-02 5:24 ` Andy Gross
[not found] ` <1411965189-24499-1-git-send-email-architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-09-29 4:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add BAM v1.3.0 support Archit Taneja
2014-11-12 10:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Generalize BAM register offset calculations Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542BB9C7.2000600@smartplayin.com \
--to=pramod.gurav-edoirqu9xnj5xlmnweqjbq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=agross-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=architt-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=galak-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=vinod.koul-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).