From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 17:06:59 +0200 Message-ID: <542EBB93.108@gmail.com> References: <1411157684-6991-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <-7443282711873112734@unknownmsgid> <20141003141102.GJ3895@titan.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141003141102.GJ3895-u4khhh1J0LxI1Ri9qeTfzeTW4wlIGRCZ@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Cooper , Benoit Masson Cc: Andrew Lunn , Gregory Clement , Ezequiel Garcia , Thomas Petazzoni , Benoit Masson , "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , "linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/03/2014 04:11 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 04:11:23PM +0200, Benoit Masson wrote: >>> Le 19 sept. 2014 =E0 22:14, Sebastian Hesselbarth a =E9crit : >>> this is a patch set preparing barebox support for ix4-300d. As usua= l, >>> I stumbled upon a few nice-to-haves before actually touching ix4-30= 0d >>> dts. As it is a mach-mvebu thing, I just added the related mailing >>> lists instead of each of the DT maintainers. >>> >>> First 5 patches consolidate SoC-specific pinctrl nodes to one commo= n >>> node in armada-xp.dtsi, compatible overwrites for each SoC, and nod= e >>> alias usage for each board. Also, ge{0,1} pinctrl settings are move= d >>> to the common node from one board specific node. >>> >>> Last 3 patches then use that ge{0,1} pinctrl settings on ix4-300d w= hich >>> is vital for bootloader init. During exploration of ix4-300d, I als= o >>> found a i2c eeprom that has not been added to the dts, yet. Finally= , >>> there is only one 74hc595 on ix4 mainboard while dts property is se= t >>> for two. >>> >>> I cannot recall in detail what is on that eeprom, but IIRC it is no= thing >>> important. Some reg,addr pairs for some init stuff that should have >>> already been done by stock u-boot. Anyway, adding the node will do = no >>> harm. >>> >>> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not = in >>> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Ben= oit >>> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great. >> >> I'm not sure what to test since I only receive some patch from the >> series of 8. Should I get all 8 or only those you sent me. I'll be >> able to test during next week. > > Did you ever get a chance to test this series? Uhm, I never prepared a branch for Benoit to test. I have pushed the patches with Thomas Acked-by's and renamed eeprom node based on v3.17-rc1 to https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git devel/mvebu-ix4 Sebastian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html