From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Fainelli Subject: Re: [RFC] Culling traffic volume on devicetree mailing list Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:05:20 -0800 Message-ID: <5433179.eNHenyFL08@lenovo> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Grant Likely Cc: "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Rob Herring , Ian Campbell List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi, Le mardi 21 janvier 2014, 14:40:48 Grant Likely a =E9crit : > Hi everyone, >=20 > Today on the devicetree conf call we (Rob, Ian and I) talked about > culling the volume of traffic on the devicetree list so that it would > be more useful to the DTC maintainers and non-Linux users like > freebsd. We'd like to propose creating the following two lists so tha= t > those interested don't need to drink from the firehose: >=20 > devicetree-compiler: Specifically for discussing dt tooling topics > (parsing, schema validation, data format) >=20 > devicetree-spec: For discussing 'core' device tree bindings. ie. > anything that would be a candidate for putting into an ePAPR type > spec. Individual device bindings would continue to be posted to > devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, but anything affecting subsystems or > generic patterns should be posted to this new list. >=20 > Thoughts? I definitively support that idea. Any schedule on when you plan on crea= ting=20 those two mailing-lists? --=20 =46lorian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" i= n the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html