From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thor Thayer Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm: dts: socfpga: Add SPI nodes & update copyright. Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 13:05:35 -0500 Message-ID: <54357CEF.8000108@opensource.altera.com> References: <1412711297-31857-1-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <1412711297-31857-3-git-send-email-tthayer@opensource.altera.com> <20141007231200.GR4609@sirena.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141007231200.GR4609@sirena.org.uk> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Brown Cc: jkosina@suse.cz, pawel.moll@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, dinguyen@opensource.altera.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, tthayer.linux@gmail.com, tthayer@altera.com, axel.lin@ingics.com, baruch@tkos.co.il, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 10/07/2014 06:12 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 02:48:17PM -0500,tthayer@opensource.altera.com wrote: > >> Add 2 SPI nodes to SOCFPGA device tree. Update copyright. >> Update spi-dw.txt with bus-num as an optional property. > Again, this is just randomly mixing multiple changes. Also why are we > adding a bus-num property - bus numbers are an implementation detail of > Linux and I can't see any reason to put them in the device tree. If > there were one the binding would need to explain what they were. OK. I will leave these changes out of the patch. Sorry about the noise. I saw the spi-summary referenced the bus-num spi. so I thought it could be added to the bindings document. The bus was defaulting to 32766 if the bus wasn't assigned from the device tree (spi32766.0). Thanks, Thor