From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Hesselbarth Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Armada XP pinctrl consolidation and ix4-300d fixes Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 23:48:33 +0100 Message-ID: <54556341.6040506@gmail.com> References: <1411157684-6991-1-git-send-email-sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com> <20141101223625.GB3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141101223625.GB3698@titan.lakedaemon.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jason Cooper Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Andrew Lunn , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ezequiel Garcia , Gregory Clement , Benoit Masson , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 01.11.2014 23:36, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:14:36PM +0200, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> this is a patch set preparing barebox support for ix4-300d. As usual, >> I stumbled upon a few nice-to-haves before actually touching ix4-300d >> dts. As it is a mach-mvebu thing, I just added the related mailing >> lists instead of each of the DT maintainers. >> >> First 5 patches consolidate SoC-specific pinctrl nodes to one common >> node in armada-xp.dtsi, compatible overwrites for each SoC, and node >> alias usage for each board. Also, ge{0,1} pinctrl settings are moved >> to the common node from one board specific node. >> >> Last 3 patches then use that ge{0,1} pinctrl settings on ix4-300d which >> is vital for bootloader init. During exploration of ix4-300d, I also >> found a i2c eeprom that has not been added to the dts, yet. Finally, >> there is only one 74hc595 on ix4 mainboard while dts property is set >> for two. >> >> I cannot recall in detail what is on that eeprom, but IIRC it is nothing >> important. Some reg,addr pairs for some init stuff that should have >> already been done by stock u-boot. Anyway, adding the node will do no >> harm. >> >> Patches are based on v3.17-rc1 and intended for v3.18 but I am not in >> a hurry. I only compile tested this, so a formal Tested-by from Benoit >> for the ix4 and any other Armada XP board would be great. > > I lost track of this thread, are you resending? Did Benoit get a > successful test run? Looks like there was this A0 stepping thing, but basically yes http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg53364.html I have just rebased it on top of v3.18-rc1, feel free to pick them up from git://git.infradead.org/users/hesselba/linux-berlin.git devel/mvebu/ix4-300d git://git.infradead.org/users/hesselba/linux-berlin.git Sebastian