From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Coquelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] phy: miphy28lp: Add PHY header file for DT x Driver defines Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:39:40 +0100 Message-ID: <546095EC.2040501@st.com> References: <1415098284-11182-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> <1415098284-11182-3-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org> <545B1C53.9010406@ti.com> <545B3FA4.8040109@st.com> <20141106112825.GC26543@x1> <545B6144.2020503@st.com> <20141106153659.GD26543@x1> <545B9F15.5070404@st.com> <20141107130538.GB3745@x1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20141107130538.GB3745@x1> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Lee Jones , Kishon Vijay Abraham I Cc: Gabriel FERNANDEZ , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , Srinivas Kandagatla , Patrice Chotard , Russell King , Grant Likely , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@stlinux.com, Gabriel Fernandez List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On 11/07/2014 02:05 PM, Lee Jones wrote: > If the merge turns out to be simple, then Git will do the correct > thing; however, if the first version of the patch is applied, then > some changes around the same area of the file occur _then_ when the > second version (of the same patch differing only by SHA1) is applied > Git will get confused. If it has the same SHA1 however, Git will > discard it as 'already applied'. This is the reason we pass around > shared tags to immutable branches. Looking at how the patch is trivial, I persist to think there is no issue. But OK, I will prepare an immutable branch.. Kishon, checkpatch complains because this new file has no maintainer. Is it ok for you if I add it to the Generic PHY subsystem? Regards, Maxime